Re: [PWE3] L2TPEXT review of L2TPv3 extensions in draft-ietf-pwe3-segmented-pw-15

Acked, but it would be good to have at least a note that the LDP PW status 
TLV should be mapped to the L2TPv3 Extended Circuit Status Values TLV at 
switching points.  The mappings themselves are obvious enough.

The v3 TLV is specified in http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5641

Thanks,

Neil.

On Wed, 9 Jun 2010, Carlos Pignataro wrote:

> We received three responses volunteering to review the document for
> L2TPext: Prashant Jhingran, Sam Aldrin, and Neil McGill in Cc.
> 
> The current version is at
> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pwe3-segmented-pw-15>. Please
> send your comments and Acks/Nacks to pwe3@ietf.org, Cc to L2tpext@ietf.org.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -- Carlos, on behalf of L2TPext.
> 
> On 6/3/2010 6:14 PM, Luca Martini wrote:
> > L2TPEXT WG,
> > he IESG as asked that you review the proposed L2TPv3 extensions 
> > documented in draft-ietf-pwe3-segmented-pw-14.
> > 
> > These extensions are documented in section 8.
> > 
> > Please advise us if you have any objections to the proposed additions.
> > 
> > Thanks.
> > Luca Martini
> > on behalf of pwe3 WG.
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > pwe3 mailing list
> > pwe3@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
> > 
> 