IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [PWE3] Confusion around IANA MPLS PW Type allocation for CEP

"Andrew G. Malis" <amalis@gmail.com> Thu, 24 May 2007 18:07 UTC

Return-path: <pwe3-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HrHiW-0003Qy-1X; Thu, 24 May 2007 14:07:16 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HrHiU-0003Qs-9i for pwe3@ietf.org; Thu, 24 May 2007 14:07:14 -0400
Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.241]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HrHiT-0000zP-9S for pwe3@ietf.org; Thu, 24 May 2007 14:07:14 -0400
Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c17so97431anc for <pwe3@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 May 2007 11:07:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=kmoT+JVoYWJu7x3BTzO+fmpvyRfaUd/2cQqve2Gm5R0tdUp+1QmghWZM7U/aU/zNzbbqXkGynI6GH8jep3Iy3t1to2OgJHt/50gyWippSEPw0MRw/TshOacRvCexwThsKCwwE3ChIz1sHyVThYC1DghRvb5oPLesemipWL5U73I=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=TFHqhN5w/qrusgrgahiobPPElw4r+CZ2oWd6qpcC6WDbtLjfVN/oO7nQzGc5hJZTcSixevnlXUBy7OKwG6V/l1k6UunXiW7ASO9ANgyDELk/CCF+7Ij0AVB5zZ17UDf+ovdnUCLRdF7B2qXnpBCYKZWqPlU5v4/Cvp42fHwLdOg=
Received: by 10.100.254.10 with SMTP id b10mr1868894ani.1180030031880; Thu, 24 May 2007 11:07:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.100.144.19 with HTTP; Thu, 24 May 2007 11:07:11 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <b2d141720705241107w41a8879flbbd05f0a87a3621d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 14:07:11 -0400
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <amalis@gmail.com>
To: stbryant@cisco.com
Subject: Re: [PWE3] Confusion around IANA MPLS PW Type allocation for CEP
In-Reply-To: <46558BE4.2010509@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <0606D918CE9CEA4E9835D2CDAA001A95E4865B@ilmail1.il.reduxcom.com> <46558715.80806@cisco.com> <0606D918CE9CEA4E9835D2CDAA001A95E48664@ilmail1.il.reduxcom.com> <46558BE4.2010509@cisco.com>
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 287c806b254c6353fcb09ee0e53bbc5e
Cc: pwe3@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Pseudo Wires Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1977730612=="
Errors-To: pwe3-bounces@ietf.org

It looks like it's about time I dusted off and submitted the original
draft-malis (CEM) to be published as a historic/informational RFC. :-)

Cheers,
Andy

On 5/24/07, Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com> wrote:
>
> Perfect
>
> - Stewart
>
> Ron Cohen wrote:
> > Stewart,
> >
> > Would the suggestion below be better:
> >
> > 0x0008  SONET/SDH Circuit Emulation (historic, pre-standard)
> > 0x0010  SONET/SDH Circuit Emulation over Packet               [CEP]
> >
> > Best,
> > Ron
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Stewart Bryant [mailto:stbryant@cisco.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 3:38 PM
> > To: Ron Cohen
> > Cc: pwe3@ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [PWE3] Confusion around IANA MPLS PW Type allocation for
> > CEP
> >
> > I think that we should use the keyword "historic" in the case of 0x8 to
> > emphasis that people do not need to build both versions.
> >
> > - Stewart
> >
> >
> > Ron Cohen wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Currently both RFC4446 as well as IANA list two MPLS PW types for
> >> SONET/SDH emulation (CEP):
> >>
> >> 0x0008  SONET/SDH Circuit Emulation Service Over MPLS    [CEP]
> >> 0x0010  SONET/SDH Circuit Emulation over Packet          [CEP]
> >>
> >> This is an error. The first value (0x0008) was supposed to be kept for
> >> historical use of the pre-standard SONET/SDH emulation while the
> >>
> > latter
> >
> >> (0x0010) was supposed to be used for the standard CEP.
> >>
> >> The proposal is to change the values in IANA MPLS PW types to the
> >> following:
> >>
> >> 0x0008  SONET/SDH Circuit Emulation (pre-standard implementations)
> >> 0x0010  SONET/SDH Circuit Emulation over Packet          [CEP]
> >>
> >> Please send comments to the list.
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Ron
> >>
> >> Ron Cohen
> >> Resolute Networks
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> pwe3 mailing list
> >> pwe3@ietf.org
> >> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> pwe3 mailing list
> pwe3@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
>

_______________________________________________
pwe3 mailing list
pwe3@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email