Re: [PWE3] PWE3 draft-shen-pwe3-endpoint-fast-protection

"Bocci, Matthew (Matthew)" <matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com> Thu, 12 December 2013 14:31 UTC

Return-Path: <matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7722C1ADF26 for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 06:31:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yeRUk-lX7194 for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 06:31:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ihemail3.lucent.com (ihemail3.lucent.com [135.245.0.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A31311ADBD5 for <pwe3@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 06:31:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (h135-239-2-42.lucent.com [135.239.2.42]) by ihemail3.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id rBCEUtVd010642 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 12 Dec 2013 08:30:57 -0600 (CST)
Received: from FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.111]) by fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id rBCEUkBH010345 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 12 Dec 2013 15:30:55 +0100
Received: from FR711WXCHMBA05.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.1.146]) by FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.111]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 15:30:53 +0100
From: "Bocci, Matthew (Matthew)" <matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: Yimin Shen <yshen@juniper.net>, "agmalis@gmail.com" <agmalis@gmail.com>, "stbryant@cisco.com" <stbryant@cisco.com>, "adrian@olddog.co.uk" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, Adrian Farrel <afarrel@juniper.net>
Thread-Topic: PWE3 draft-shen-pwe3-endpoint-fast-protection
Thread-Index: Ac73P0T/HBM6FQ6jQO6sDQer/guRAP///jWA
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 14:30:52 +0000
Message-ID: <CECF788C.59507%matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <70b3084d60364d09b936284ab47be52c@BY2PR05MB728.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <70b3084d60364d09b936284ab47be52c@BY2PR05MB728.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.9.131030
x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.39]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <CE3AE1B54760B046A6DB9155542AD017@exchange.lucent.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.37
Cc: "pwe3@ietf.org" <pwe3@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [PWE3] PWE3 draft-shen-pwe3-endpoint-fast-protection
X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Pseudowire Emulation Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pwe3/>
List-Post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 14:31:11 -0000

Hi Yimin

I think that given the general support for this, it makes sense to adopt
it, but I need to make sure the WG is aware of the fact that one of the
co-authors is not responding. I¹ll send a note to the list about this.
There will be another call for IPR when we go through WG last call, anyway.

Matthew

On 12/12/2013 13:37, "Yimin Shen" <yshen@juniper.net> wrote:

>Hi chairs,
>
>draft-shen-pwe3-endpoint-fast-protection-04.txt seems to be stuck. It
>looks like you got a positive response to the poll for working group
>adoption, and you received responses from all but one of the co-authors
>to your question about IPR. The final author, Rahul Aggarwal, seems to be
>missing in action.
>
>(BTW, Juniper has done IPR disclosure for two patents related to this
>draft.)
>
>Do you intend to block advancement of the draft until you get a response
>from Rahul, or can you just bring the situation to the attention of the
>working group and move on? I should point out that the I-D does contain
>the boilerplate statement that all authors will follow the terms of BCP
>and the IETF Trust Legal Provisions.
>
>
>Regards,
>
>/Yimin
>
>
>
>