Re: [PWE3] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5994 (2547)

"Malis, Andrew G. (Andy)" <andrew.g.malis@verizon.com> Mon, 11 October 2010 16:28 UTC

From: "Malis, Andrew G. (Andy)" <andrew.g.malis@verizon.com>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com>, Monique Morrow <mmorrow@cisco.com>, George Swallow <swallow@cisco.com>, Rao Cherukuri <cherukuri@juniper.net>, Thomas Nadeau <thomas.nadeau@huawei.com>, "neil.2.harrison@bt.com" <neil.2.harrison@bt.com>, "ben@niven-jenkins.co.uk" <ben@niven-jenkins.co.uk>, "rdroms.ietf@gmail.com" <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>, "jari.arkko@piuha.net" <jari.arkko@piuha.net>, Matthew Bocci <matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 12:28:46 -0400
Thread-Topic: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5994 (2547)
Thread-Index: ActmSnZl4djiwe/KToanSh7DKpwyiQDFun97
Message-ID: <C8D8B37E.12016%andrew.g.malis@one.verizon.com>
In-Reply-To: <20101007180706.9AEA1E06C7@rfc-editor.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.6.0.100712
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "ah@TR-Sys.de" <ah@TR-Sys.de>, "pwe3@ietf.org" <pwe3@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [PWE3] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5994 (2547)
Precedence: list

Alfred,

Thanks for the sharp reading! The original draft for this RFC pre-dated
5462, but you're right, the terms should have been updated. It's a good
thing to watch for on future reviews.

Cheers,
Andy

On 10/7/10 14:07 , "RFC Errata System" <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:

> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5994,
> "Application of Ethernet Pseudowires to MPLS Transport Networks".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5994&eid=2547
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Alfred Hoenes <ah@TR-Sys.de>
> 
> Section: GLOBAL
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> a)
> 
> 
> 
> MPLS EXP field
> 
> 
> 
> b)
> 
> 
> 
> EXP-Inferred-PSC LSP (E-LSP)
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> a)
> 
> 
> 
> MPLS Traffic Class field
> 
> 
> 
> b)
> 
> 
> 
> Explicitly TC-encoded-PSC LSP (E-LSP)
> 
> Notes
> -----
> Rationale:
> 
>   RFC 5462 has carefully changed the terminology and updated RFCs 3032
> 
>   and 3270 (among others); it has given a detailed explantion why this
> 
>   needs to be done and confirmed that all future RFCs should
> 
>   unconditionally use the updated terms.
> 
>   See in particular Sections 2.1 and 2.2 of RFC 5462 for the updates to
> 
>   RFC 3032 and RFC 3270 (respectively) that are relevant for this RFC.
> 
> 
> 
>   Ironically, RFC 5994 cites RFC 5462, yet uses the obsolete terms. Sigh!
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC5994 (draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-transport-04)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Application of Ethernet Pseudowires to MPLS Transport
> Networks
> Publication Date    : October 2010
> Author(s)           : S. Bryant, Ed., M. Morrow, G. Swallow, R. Cherukuri, T.
> Nadeau, N. Harrison, B. Niven-Jenkins
> Category            : INFORMATIONAL
> Source              : Pseudo Wire Emulation Edge to Edge
> Area                : Internet
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG

[PWE3] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5994 (2547) RFC Errata System
Re: [PWE3] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5994 (2… Malis, Andrew G. (Andy)