Re: [PWE3] Poll for WG adoption of draft-shen-pwe3-endpoint-fast-protection-04

Hi,

I would like to see the  following questions answered before the document
could be adopted.
Here are the reasons why.

1. The scope of the document says End point protection for SS-PW and MS-PW.
But what it is failing to consider is the absence of signaling component. I
do not see how this will work when the PW's are set up statically w/o the
dynamic signaling in both SS-PW and MS-PW?

2. Would also like to see how the protection works, in terms of setup and
working model, where a MS-PW is made of dynamically signaled SS-PW and
statically setup SS-PW stitched to form a MS-PW.

3. By reading sec 5. the way I understood that this is only possible with
control plane being present. If my understanding is incorrect, would like
to see text detailing on how this could be achieved in the absence of
CP(control plane).

4. In case CP is mandatory, I would like to see the document title and
scope to change to reflect the same.

thanks
-sam

On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 7:26 AM, Bocci, Matthew (Matthew) <
matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:

>  This email begins a two week poll to help the chairs determine if there
> is consensus to adopt draft-shen-pwe3-endpoint-fast-protection-04 as an
> PWE3 working group draft.
>
>  The draft can be found here:
> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-shen-pwe3-endpoint-fast-protection-04.txt
>
>  Please read the draft and indicate to the list if you support adoption,
> or if you do not support adoption (giving reasons).
>
>  Please note that this is only a call for adoption. There needs to be
> consensus that this draft is a good basis for the work, but it does not
> need to be perfect at this stage.
>
>  The poll for adoption will close in two weeks time, on Friday 13th
> September.
>
>  Best regards,
>
>  Matthew
>
> _______________________________________________
> pwe3 mailing list
> pwe3@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
>
>