[PWE3] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pwe3-vccv-impl-survey-results-01.txt
internet-drafts@ietf.org Thu, 27 June 2013 20:53 UTC
Return-Path: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2036E21F9D4D; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 13:53:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.295
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.295 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.305, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fHgJ-dfsyTcG; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 13:53:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23B1121F9A90; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 13:53:18 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.51.p2
Message-ID: <20130627205318.20312.61395.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 13:53:18 -0700
Cc: pwe3@ietf.org
Subject: [PWE3] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pwe3-vccv-impl-survey-results-01.txt
X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Pseudo Wires Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pwe3>
List-Post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 20:53:23 -0000
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Pseudowire Emulation Edge to Edge Working Group of the IETF. Title : The Pseudowire (PW) & Virtual Circuit Connectivity Verification (VCCV) Implementation Survey Results Author(s) : Andrew G. Malis Filename : draft-ietf-pwe3-vccv-impl-survey-results-01.txt Pages : 37 Date : 2013-06-27 Abstract: Most pseudowire Emulation Edge-to-Edge (PWE3) encapsulations mandate the use of the Control Word (CW) to carry information essential to the emulation, to inhibit ECMP behavior, and to discriminate OAM from PW packets. However, some encapsulations treat the Control Word as optional. As a result, implementations of the CW, for encapsulations for which it is optional, vary by equipment manufacturer, equipment model and service provider network. Similarly, Virtual Circuit Connectivity Verification (VCCV) supports three Control Channel (CC) types and multiple Connectivity Verification (CV) Types. This flexibility has led to reports of interoperability issues within deployed networks and associated drafts to attempt to remedy the situation. This survey of the PW/VCCV user community was conducted to determine implementation trends. The survey and results is presented herein. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pwe3-vccv-impl-survey-results There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pwe3-vccv-impl-survey-results-01 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pwe3-vccv-impl-survey-results-01 Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
- [PWE3] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pwe3-vccv-impl-surv… internet-drafts