Re: [PWE3] FW: New Version Notification for draft-mirsky-mpls-tp-cv-adv-01.txt

zhang.fei3@zte.com.cn Tue, 31 July 2012 02:56 UTC

Return-Path: <zhang.fei3@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D363111E80E0; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 19:56:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -97.078
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-97.078 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.557, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_DOUBLE_IP_LOOSE=0.76, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OZkHiYindx8S; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 19:56:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx5.zte.com.cn (mx6.zte.com.cn [95.130.199.165]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 571FA11E8087; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 19:56:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.30.17.100] by mx5.zte.com.cn with surfront esmtp id 107233491178658; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 10:45:29 +0800 (CST)
Received: from [10.30.3.20] by [192.168.168.16] with StormMail ESMTP id 228.5504356121; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 10:56:06 +0800 (CST)
Received: from notes_smtp.zte.com.cn ([10.30.1.239]) by mse01.zte.com.cn with ESMTP id q6V2tvDB047639; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 10:56:03 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from zhang.fei3@zte.com.cn)
In-Reply-To: <FE60A4E52763E84B935532D7D9294FF139249FFAF1@EUSAACMS0715.eamcs.ericsson.se>
To: Gregory Mirsky <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-KeepSent: 2695D28A:7D4CF387-48257A4C:000F7D25; type=4; name=$KeepSent
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.6 March 06, 2007
Message-ID: <OF2695D28A.7D4CF387-ON48257A4C.000F7D25-48257A4C.00101947@zte.com.cn>
From: zhang.fei3@zte.com.cn
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 10:56:01 +0800
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes_smtp/zte_ltd(Release 8.5.3FP1 HF212|May 23, 2012) at 2012-07-31 10:56:00, Serialize complete at 2012-07-31 10:56:00
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 0010194748257A4C_="
X-MAIL: mse01.zte.com.cn q6V2tvDB047639
Cc: pwe3-bounces@ietf.org, "pwe3 (pwe3@ietf.org)" <pwe3@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [PWE3] FW: New Version Notification for draft-mirsky-mpls-tp-cv-adv-01.txt
X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Pseudo Wires Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pwe3>
List-Post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 02:56:16 -0000

Hi Greg


Hi Greg

Hope you well

I have taken a close look at the draft-mirsky-mpls-tp-cv-adv-01, be glad 
to see that the length of the defined VCCV Extended CV Advertiseemnt 
sub-TLV is variable now, which is more extensible.
 
Below are some minor comments on this draft that I like to share with you, 
both of them have been discussed with you offline (Please check the email 
sent out at 2012-02-29 11:19 with the title RE: comments on the draft 
draft-mirsky-mpls-tp-cv-adv)

1. I am afraid that IP/UDP encapsulation of BFD packets are not excluded 
by the MPLS-TP mechanism

2. Since the PW needs to support the other defined MPLS-TP OAM, such PM 
and FMS, maybe the name of this sub-TLV can be more MPLS-TP orientied 

Another question that want to check with you is about the relationship 
between your draft and another draft 
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-tp-oam-config-00. Although 
we also addressed the MPLS-TP OAM negotiation in the Initialization 
message in the draft draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-tp-oam-config-00, as you pointed 
out in IETF83 meeting that the Capability negotiations in the Initiation 
message are related to the LDP message procedures themself. I tend to 
agree with you on this point after checking RFC5561 and related 
extensions, and would like to hear more opinions from WG.

Best regards

Fei



Gregory Mirsky <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com> 
发件人:  pwe3-bounces@ietf.org
2012-07-24 01:00

收件人
"pwe3   (pwe3@ietf.org)" <pwe3@ietf.org>
抄送

主题
[PWE3] FW: New Version Notification for draft-mirsky-mpls-tp-cv-adv-01.txt






 
Dear All,
The new version was recently publish to address discussion at IETF-83 
meeting in Paris.
I welcome your comments and will greatly appreciate consideration to adopt 
the draft as PWE3 WG document.

                 Regards,
                                 Greg

-----Original Message-----
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org]
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 2:15 PM
To: Gregory Mirsky
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-mirsky-mpls-tp-cv-adv-01.txt


A new version of I-D, draft-mirsky-mpls-tp-cv-adv-01.txt
has been successfully submitted by Greg Mirsky and posted to the IETF 
repository.

Filename:                 draft-mirsky-mpls-tp-cv-adv
Revision:                 01
Title:                            VCCV MPLS-TP Connectivity Verification 
(CV) Capability Advertisement
Creation date:            2012-07-13
WG ID:                            Individual Submission
Number of pages: 8
URL:             
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-mirsky-mpls-tp-cv-adv-01.txt
Status:          
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mirsky-mpls-tp-cv-adv
Htmlized:        http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mirsky-mpls-tp-cv-adv-01
Diff:            
http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-mirsky-mpls-tp-cv-adv-01

Abstract:
   This document specifies how use of proactive Connectivity
   Verification, Continuity Check, and Remote Defect Indication for the
   MPLS Transport Profile [RFC6428] affects operation and management
   function election for PW VCCV [RFC5085], [RFC5885].

  


The IETF Secretariat
_______________________________________________
pwe3 mailing list
pwe3@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3