[PWE3] Fwd: Liaison Statement: Re: Review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-data-plane-03 (Ref #035.02)
Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Thu, 29 July 2010 08:11 UTC
Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: pwe3@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pwe3@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FE6E3A68B5; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 01:11:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 76mHVw5R9kJR; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 01:11:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.pi.nu (mail.pi.nu [194.71.127.148]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B37F3A67D1; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 01:11:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [130.129.119.231] (dhcp-77e7.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.119.231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by mail.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6FA39D404F; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 10:12:16 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4C5137DE.6090504@pi.nu>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 10:12:14 +0200
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100711 Thunderbird/3.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: pwe3@ietf.org, CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [PWE3] Fwd: Liaison Statement: Re: Review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-data-plane-03 (Ref #035.02)
X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Pseudo Wires Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pwe3>
List-Post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 08:11:56 -0000
This liaison should have been copied to the pwe3 and ccamp lists also. /Loa -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Liaison Statement: Re: Review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-data-plane-03 (Ref #035.02) Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 05:07:17 -0400 From: IETF Chair <chair@ietf.org> To: tsbsg15@itu.int, greg.jones@itu.int, hiroshi.ota@itu.int CC: adrian.farrel@huawei.com, iesg@ietf.org, loa@pi.nu, malcolm.betts@zte.com.cn, mpls@ietf.org, paf@cisco.com, rcallon@juniper.net, stbryant@cisco.com, steve.trowbridge@alcatel-lucent.com, swallow@cisco.com, yoichi.maeda@ntt-at.co.jp, IETF Liaison Statements <statements@ietf.org> Thank you for your liaison COM15-LS207-E (ref 35.01) dated 24-June-2010 providing further review comments on draft-ietf-mpls-tp-data-plane. This document completed IETF last call on 14-June-2010 and received IETF consensus. The document was reviewed by the IESG on 17-June-2010 and received approval for publication subject to some minor modifications. Documents in the RFC Editor's queue are only open for minor editorial changes. We have examined the changes proposed by the ITU-T and have formed the following view: Proposed change on page 8: This change is of technical substance, and cannot be made to a document in the RFC Editor's Queue. Proposed change to Section 6: The terms "peer" and "neighbor" are well understood within the IETF and do not need further clarification. The proposed description of the application scenario constitutes a change of technical substance, and cannot be made to a document in the RFC Editor's Queue. If IETF contributors feel that there is an issue to be resolved, there are two processes that are available to make changes to published RFCs. One method is to submit an Erratum Notice using the IETF web pages (http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php). The other method is to produce a revision or modification to the published RFC by submitting an Internet-Draft and taking it through the IETF consensus process. Both methods are subject to review before approval. On behalf of the IESG, Russ Housley -- Loa Andersson email: loa.andersson@ericsson.com Sr Strategy and Standards Manager loa@pi.nu Ericsson Inc phone: +46 10 717 52 13 +46 767 72 92 13
- [PWE3] Fwd: Liaison Statement: Re: Review of draf… Loa Andersson