[PWE3] Fwd: IETF-84 minutes

["Andrew G. Malis" <[e-mail]>]

PWE3ers,

We intend to make the enclosed changes to the minutes.

Cheers,
Andy

---------- Forwarded message ----------

From: Yaakov Stein <[e-mail]>
Date: Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 2:51 PM
Subject: RE: [PWE3] IETF-84 minutes
To: David Sinicrope <[e-mail]>
Cc: BOCCI Matthew <[e-mail]>, "Andrew G.
Malis" <[e-mail]>

David (and Andy and Matthew)

I was on vacation when the minutes came on-line, and just looked them over.

A few fixes :

1) I believe that my comments on 1588oMPLS are now in place (although
without my name, but that's fine)
2) In 2. Virtual Circuit Connectivity Verification version 2 (VCCV2),
my second comment should have said
  To understand VCCV there are 4 documents and more if using BFD.
 The options are either to write one document that includes everything,
 or to write a short document that only obsoletes RA and adds Type 4.
 The WG needs to determine the way forward.
3) In 6. Transparent SDH/SONET over Packet my first comment should say
     YJS: 4553 like techniques were considered (at the time).
     This draft is "hacks" SDH in a number of bad ways.
     When physical layer continuity is broken, the SDH architecture
has requirements.
  My second comment should say
     YJS:  I have seen this used in many places.
4) In 10. MPLS-TP Pseudowire Configuration using OpenFlow 1.3 I asked
  if this was only an academic exercise. I believe that the answer was yes.


nits:
 Sharham -> Shahram
 require -> require
 aa -> a
 why -> why

Y(J)S