IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [PWE3] VCCV for gal draft

"Shah, Himanshu" <hshah@ciena.com> Tue, 19 August 2014 20:11 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=7308bc3eae=hshah@ciena.com>
X-Original-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F28551A6EF1 for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 13:11:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.266
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.266 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hsMwNHUT5MvM for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 13:10:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00103a01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00103a01.pphosted.com [67.231.152.227]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1F901A6EE5 for <pwe3@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 13:10:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0002317.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00103a01.pphosted.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id s7JKATbg028888; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 16:10:53 -0400
Received: from mdwexght02.ciena.com (LIN1-118-36-29.ciena.com [63.118.36.29]) by mx0b-00103a01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 1nvadwrw43-2 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 19 Aug 2014 16:10:53 -0400
Received: from MDWEXCHCGSIHT01.ciena.com (10.4.140.106) by MDWEXGHT02.ciena.com (10.4.140.213) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.298.1; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 16:10:53 -0400
Received: from ONWVEXCHHT04.ciena.com (10.128.6.44) by MDWEXCHCGSIHT01.ciena.com (10.4.140.106) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.298.1; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 16:10:52 -0400
Received: from ONWVEXCHMB04.ciena.com ([::1]) by ONWVEXCHHT04.ciena.com ([::1]) with mapi; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 16:10:51 -0400
From: "Shah, Himanshu" <hshah@ciena.com>
To: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 16:10:50 -0400
Thread-Topic: [PWE3] VCCV for gal draft
Thread-Index: Ac+7vhjDmv0d7JtJT/mOrOP1+yoMSwAUN1AAAAliNVA=
Message-ID: <40746B2300A8FC4AB04EE722A593182B772B2030@ONWVEXCHMB04.ciena.com>
References: <40746B2300A8FC4AB04EE722A593182B772B1D99@ONWVEXCHMB04.ciena.com> <141D7BE3-A795-4F6B-A562-41AE80EFBB64@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <141D7BE3-A795-4F6B-A562-41AE80EFBB64@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, en-CA
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US, en-CA
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-10.0.0.1412-7.000.1014-20894.002
X-TM-AS-Result: No--40.224000-0.000000-31
X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: Yes
X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_40746B2300A8FC4AB04EE722A593182B772B2030ONWVEXCHMB04cie_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.12.52, 1.0.27, 0.0.0000 definitions=2014-08-19_05:2014-08-19,2014-08-19,1970-01-01 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1402240000 definitions=main-1408190232
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pwe3/teC_xdWGBj0oB8RMSR3DCyLIs_c
Cc: "pwe3@ietf.org" <pwe3@ietf.org>, Somnath Ojha <somnath@india.tejasnetworks.com>, "Stewart Bryant (stbryant)" <stbryant@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [PWE3] VCCV for gal draft
X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Pseudowire Emulation Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pwe3/>
List-Post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 20:11:04 -0000

Hi Carlos -
Was discussed.
See the last 4 lines of the minutes (below).
Consensus was to progress the "vccv-for-gal" draft.

Thanks,
himanshu

From: Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) [mailto:cpignata@cisco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 3:38 PM
To: Shah, Himanshu
Cc: pwe3@ietf.org; Stewart Bryant (stbryant); Somnath Ojha
Subject: Re: [PWE3] VCCV for gal draft

Hi, Himanshu,

Going from memory and not checking the history breadcrums (so I might be totally wrong), but -- wasn't the idea to have:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nadeau-pwe3-vccv2-00
Replace
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pwe3-vccv-for-gal-01
?

Thanks,

Carlos.

On Aug 19, 2014, at 10:58 AM, Shah, Himanshu <hshah@ciena.com<mailto:hshah@ciena.com>> wrote:


Hi Stewart,
In IETF 89 WG meeting we discussed to revive http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pwe3-vccv-for-gal-01
Relevant minutes from the meeting below.

Stewart - you agreed to refresh it (we had discussions on the emails after the meeting as well).
If you are busy and would like me to, let me know.
I had talked to Tom N. a while back and he was busy with SDN and no time to pursue this, so one of us have to.

Please let me know.

Thanks,
himanshu


============ minutes from IETF 89 PWE3 WG meeting ================


Matthew: anything to say on VCCV for GAL? (VCCV type 4)
Luca: where's Tom N? He was heading it.  3 documens 4447 bis for last call
refresh adoption keep alive draft, but not sure if interest.  If not, willing to drop it.  VCCV Type 4, Tom lead author, we set out a stable draft but probably expired.  Nothing current, willing to drop.
WG: No!
Luca: then we need someone to drive.
Himanshu: I can help.  We need the draft and the IANA assignment.
Matthew: please sort out refreshing the draft.
Himanshu: Yes. Is WG draft.
YJS: Proposal for this. 3 drafts around this. THere is far less interest but want to close type 4. We should make one draft that says here are the types, deprecate 2 and add 4.
Luca: rfc4447bis is just an errata with no tech changes.  The document you are talking about is there.  We didn't want to go down a rat hole.  Don't want to open RFC 5085.  Just need to progress this, it is in good shape.
YJS: WG wanted to clean up all documents, but no time. So we will just progress the current draft.


_______________________________________________
pwe3 mailing list
pwe3@ietf.org<mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email