PMP> Comments on latest Printer MIB

Bob Pentecost <bpenteco@boi.hp.com> Fri, 13 June 1997 22:54 UTC

Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa20153; 13 Jun 97 18:54 EDT
Received: from lists.underscore.com (uscore-1.mv.com [199.125.85.30]) by cnri.reston.va.us (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTPid SAA20007 for <ietf-archive@cnri.reston.va.us>; Fri, 13 Jun 1997 18:53:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by lists.underscore.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id SAA11365 for <ietf-archive@cnri.reston.va.us>; Fri, 13 Jun 1997 18:49:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by pwg.org (bulk_mailer v1.5); Fri, 13 Jun 1997 18:46:48 -0400
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by lists.underscore.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id SAA11200 for pmp-outgoing; Fri, 13 Jun 1997 18:46:06 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <01BC7819.36014660@hpb15434.boi.hp.com>
From: Bob Pentecost <bpenteco@boi.hp.com>
To: 'PWG-pmp' <pmp@pwg.org>
Subject: PMP> Comments on latest Printer MIB
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 1997 16:45:14 -0600
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: pmp-owner@pwg.org

Sorry this is late. I've been spending my Printer MIB time on localization issues.

I have the following comment on latest Printer MIB:

1) If coverOpened and coverClosed are duplicated, one of them should have their name changed and the 501 and 502 values should be noted as deprecated. I don't think they should be removed entirely since they were part of RFC 1759 (as doorOpen and doorClosed).


And to comment on the issue(s) raised by others:

I agree with Angelo...

> ----------
From:  Caruso,Angelo[SMTP:Angelo_Caruso@wb.xerox.com]
> Sent:  Monday, June 09, 1997 1:50 PM
> To:  pmp@pwg.org
> Subject:  PMP> Still two definitions of Busy
> 
> Editorial comments on the current draft (draft-ietf-printmib-mib-info-02.txt):
> 
> On page 18 of the current draft there is a definition for Busy / 
>  Temporarily Unavailable which appears as part of the same paragraph 
>  for the definition of Unavailable. I believe this should be removed 
>  since there is a second definition for Busy on page 19. I thought we 
>  had agreed to this previously.
> 
> The table on page 19 has 'Normal' as the first entry. I thought we had 
>  agreed to change the first entry from 'Normal' to 'Idle'.  There is no 
>  definition for 'Normal' but there IS a definition for 'Idle'.
> 
> There are many instances of text formatting problems (line wraps and 
>  indentations) in the draft.
> 
> Angelo 
> 
> Bob Pentecost
HP