IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Qirg] draft-irtf-qirg-principles-01

Wojciech Kozlowski <W.Kozlowski@tudelft.nl> Mon, 16 September 2019 09:48 UTC

Return-Path: <W.Kozlowski@tudelft.nl>
X-Original-To: qirg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: qirg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 582CA12081C for <qirg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 02:48:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ap4EtyPxAyaV for <qirg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 02:48:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailservice.tudelft.nl (mailservice.tudelft.nl [130.161.131.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73E13120019 for <Qirg@irtf.org>; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 02:48:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by amavis (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B83FCC007B; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 11:48:06 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at tudelft.nl
Received: from mailservice.tudelft.nl ([130.161.131.74]) by localhost (tudelft.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 3-1P6_ZKqXX8; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 11:48:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from SRV221.tudelft.net (srv221.tudelft.net [131.180.6.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx3.tudelft.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D659CC0088; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 11:48:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from SRV220.tudelft.net (131.180.6.20) by SRV221.tudelft.net (131.180.6.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P521) id 15.1.1713.5; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 11:47:59 +0200
Received: from SRV220.tudelft.net ([fe80::dc7a:a6b8:8bb9:2210]) by SRV220.tudelft.net ([fe80::dc7a:a6b8:8bb9:2210%13]) with mapi id 15.01.1713.009; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 11:47:59 +0200
From: Wojciech Kozlowski <W.Kozlowski@tudelft.nl>
To: "brunorijsman@gmail.com" <brunorijsman@gmail.com>
CC: "Qirg@irtf.org" <Qirg@irtf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Qirg] draft-irtf-qirg-principles-01
Thread-Index: AQHVZMrxhxbGT2QG90y425UHqgxg9KckZ6mAgAmU34A=
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 09:47:59 +0000
Message-ID: <4c6fda07635d7a70dadaaa90dac4b00039ba89d4.camel@tudelft.nl>
References: <c7c9afd2eb0571b821c6e4bcb4f70bd2e53d6a6b.camel@tudelft.nl> <ED4105F3-1CAD-4D16-944F-A9EFD1E886B0@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <ED4105F3-1CAD-4D16-944F-A9EFD1E886B0@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, nl-NL, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <72F37ADE3E3DB94AA0B5C56A08D4964F@forest.intra>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/qirg/O6RLK01PQaWW0fjABXhEkSDICDE>
Subject: Re: [Qirg] draft-irtf-qirg-principles-01
X-BeenThere: qirg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Quantum Internet \(proposed\) RG" <qirg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/qirg>, <mailto:qirg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/qirg/>
List-Post: <mailto:qirg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qirg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/qirg>, <mailto:qirg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 09:48:10 -0000

Thanks Bruno!

I've set up a doodle for choosing a time and date for a video call now
(https://framadate.org/iJJozdIqRtrWhwbq for those who missed that e-
mail). Hopefully, it will help get the ball rolling.

Some additional responses:

On Tue, 2019-09-10 at 09:28 +0200, Bruno Rijsman wrote:
> (2) FORMAL ISSUE TRACKING
> 
> * Use GitHub Issues (instead of a text file) to track open issues.
> The main advantage is that it allows people to take formal ownership
> of an issue.

I was considering them. However, after I sent out my initial e-mail I
got the impression that there was interest in making sure the mailing
list always remains a possible forum for discussion. I agree with this.
Having a separate discussion forum in the GitHub issues, which only a
subset of people would track, would make it confusing in my opinion.
Would be worth touching upon in the first video call.

Thanks,
Wojtek

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email