[Qirg] document status

Rodney Van Meter <rdv@sfc.wide.ad.jp> Tue, 26 March 2019 14:41 UTC

Return-Path: <rdv@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
X-Original-To: qirg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: qirg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E67531202FE for <qirg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 07:41:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wuQsOkMbAqIJ for <qirg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 07:41:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.sfc.wide.ad.jp (mail.sfc.wide.ad.jp [203.178.142.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C51D11202CC for <qirg@irtf.org>; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 07:41:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:67c:370:128:3cea:6d11:7b9e:a888] (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:370:128:3cea:6d11:7b9e:a888]) by mail.sfc.wide.ad.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E514D278791; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 23:41:07 +0900 (JST)
From: Rodney Van Meter <rdv@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 15:41:02 +0100
Message-Id: <775AD50E-1CE0-4381-B4AA-181BDF8A20B8@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
Cc: Rodney Van Meter <rdv@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
To: qirg@irtf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/qirg/u9jPlPSBwiZK7OzHDlKJM7Uv7e8>
Subject: [Qirg] document status
X-BeenThere: qirg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Quantum Internet \(proposed\) RG" <qirg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/qirg>, <mailto:qirg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/qirg/>
List-Post: <mailto:qirg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qirg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/qirg>, <mailto:qirg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 14:41:14 -0000

Thanks for a very successful meeting today.  There were excellent comments/questions from the floor that will really advance the documents, which will have a positive impact on the embryonic networks that people are building today.

Here’s what I think the current document status is.  n.b.: of course
the official status is in
https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/qirg/documents/, this is a snapshot
for discussion and FYI.

I was concerned about having screwed up the naming of several I-Ds, but we’re in good shape.

RG drafts:

1. Architectural Principles for a Quantum Internet
   draft-irtf-qirg-principles-00
   status: adopted as an RG work item in the meeting 2019/3/26
   (status was already "adopted" in datatracker, so we confirmed that)
   No objections?
   (Because we adopted the draft, the current I-D name is fine.)
   Wojciech is currently the only author, but numerous hands went up
   in the session today when asked if they would contribute to such a
   document.  I expect this will go forward and that those who
   contribute substantially will be added as authors of the document.
   (In the pleasant hypothetical where a lot of people contribute,
   we'll reorganize a bit into "editor(s)" and "contributors".)

Individual drafts:

1. Advertising Entanglement Capabilities in Quantum Networks
   draft-kaws-qirg-advent-02
   status: active individual submission
   I haven't talked to the authors directly, but this I-D jumped to
   -02 *today*.  Can the authors comment on what the changes are to
   the document, and how they want to proceed?

2. The Link Layer service in a Quantum Internet
   draft-dahlberg-ll-quantum-01
   status: active individual submission
   This I-D moved to -01 *today*.  Axel, can you comment on what
   changed between -00 and -01?  There were *excellent* questions
   today that I'm sure will drive some interesting design decisions,
   especially around identifiers for nodes.  (Not that _anyone_ in
   IETF *ever* has an opinion about a naming/identifier/locator
   architecture...)

3. Connection Setup in a Quantum Network
   draft-van-meter-qirg-quantum-connection-setup-00
   status: active individual submission
   This is what our current Quantum Internet simulator *does*, in
   terms of the content of messages exchanged.  As it moves to
   implementation for a real network, those messages could be carried
   over a variety of mechanisms.  We're happy to have feedback on
   relevant protocols that might be amenable to extensions for this.

—Rod