Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify what "prohibited header fields" are (#3345)

Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com> Wed, 15 January 2020 00:05 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 538B312006D for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 16:05:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.382
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KHLd52sFaby1 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 16:05:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-4.smtp.github.com (out-4.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2E0D120058 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 16:05:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from github-lowworker-d31a065.va3-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-d31a065.va3-iad.github.net [10.48.17.70]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07796C60EAC for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 16:05:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1579046711; bh=nABx3KguRhMRPgutF59C1LaquAiYp9tpS3b+dHHJE2k=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=op6hrFRsXgP2NHWwBU2YtMIgKpGIhqYg+IePBSE6au0c9P/u/5UUaX8d5yF/uFAOc Lhau44omv5qQeVnnboPfd7Y0LE9bd+Qac8wgNGnSXVLROaivu7qRVy2Mai+y8uekGq vCoU6qYWRD5NjK7WuxsUh9BzVTptHlb+5aKlO0p8=
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 16:05:10 -0800
From: Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK3MAMFAIOI6LUXO4XF4FOE3NEVBNHHCBRVAVI@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3345/574432826@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3345@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3345@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify what "prohibited header fields" are (#3345)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e1e5736ecc5e_1f043f964c2cd96412223a"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: MikeBishop
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/-qcJrnLJIdYnjYaUsCEzfaxGky4>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 00:05:18 -0000

> The restrictions on the use of pseudo-header fields in Section 8.1.2 of [HTTP2] also apply to HTTP/3.

This also feeds into #3264, which suggests those prohibitions should be local to the document.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3345#issuecomment-574432826