IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Prevent Idle Timeout while Blocked (#3266)

Nick Banks <notifications@github.com> Mon, 25 November 2019 14:57 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B051F120973 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 06:57:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.596
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.596 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nD0GnLAMDCQW for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 06:57:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-20.smtp.github.com (out-20.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.203]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1252D120976 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 06:57:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from github-lowworker-39b4a70.va3-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-39b4a70.va3-iad.github.net [10.48.16.66]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23D9D8C0851 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 06:57:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1574693856; bh=Smxo5oofei1ZOpu5gBua6maAebnALlPj7HO8D6Bq+xY=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=2d+/IlkQYe0vv8/zlSZIwNLJ4pw9Fkj7KUi/Ik483W6Z53jwD7s5WkVLKVnQghUkr sNkLKpG7/61u85aVqC3ygc/vujqnSLyRrcWeIbQ9a59HVQDRDneijKNZdI0jLwdIod I3796pbp1aqiifp9kqhs70ril+0hFFOvBfxCn0hI=
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 06:57:36 -0800
From: Nick Banks <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJKZWZUT77YA3KKN7RT535EPGBEVBNHHB6TAYWQ@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3266/review/322338904@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3266@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3266@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Prevent Idle Timeout while Blocked (#3266)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5ddbebe0582c_8bf3febaa8cd96496261"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: nibanks
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/0K4-45UJBOS5C8GgFHngyYztTgk>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 14:57:39 -0000

nibanks commented on this pull request.



> @@ -2353,7 +2351,8 @@ processed successfully.  The timer is also restarted when sending an
 ack-eliciting packet (see {{QUIC-RECOVERY}}), but only if no other ack-eliciting
 packets have been sent since last receiving a packet.  Restarting when sending
 packets ensures that connections do not prematurely time out when initiating new
-activity.
+activity.  An endpoint should be careful to avoid an idle timeout if it is idle

You can thank @janaiyengar for the sentence. :) Either way, I do prefer Jana's text over "might need to send", though both seem like they are just trying to skate around using normative language.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3266#discussion_r350232033

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email