Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two reasons to exceed bytes in flight (#4004)
mirjak <notifications@github.com> Mon, 17 August 2020 09:31 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D3D73A145D for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 02:31:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.009
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jQ5stwpGL8TV for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 02:31:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-25.smtp.github.com (out-25.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.208]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E618D3A145C for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 02:31:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-2e54e43.va3-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-2e54e43.va3-iad.github.net [10.48.17.27]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3763840E47 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 02:31:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1597656688; bh=rnLz+hEqWFR8sEKfHP7SHdC0IL0bpTC80nV3RA1DuUo=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=b6dN2p08YtBSZ3XVoE9n2v0mYM3rr4d+j+KdtTc2rzdFR/9FCmkHHcanJTVCzpNf7 ZfBRMe5/5K2msClwTEzVt1Z66hgc4xtmslDISGBW6QWQps80Sy4TBNGO+chV1vKDCI A1aSO8PbzHmRH3qES5DEPqljT3TPdfQ8sDy3fHZg=
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 02:31:28 -0700
From: mirjak <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK3CIFOEQSZAM72OGW55IYXXBEVBNHHCRBXL6Y@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4004/674771574@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4004@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4004@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two reasons to exceed bytes in flight (#4004)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5f3a4e70b4539_8fc196419277d"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mirjak
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/29o9JHwIgxYZrd2XVP-Z7-wEJUU>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 09:31:31 -0000
For TCP this second case if important because as long as you don't retransmit the lost packet you will not get any ACK that acknowledges new data. I guess we don't need that for QUIC. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4004#issuecomment-674771574
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Two reasons to exceed bytes … Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two reasons to exceed by… Marten Seemann
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two reasons to exceed by… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two reasons to exceed by… mirjak
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two reasons to exceed by… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two reasons to exceed by… mirjak
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two reasons to exceed by… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Two reasons to exceed by… ianswett