Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] congestion window increase on every ACKed packet could result in bursty sends (#3094)

Jana Iyengar <> Wed, 05 February 2020 09:00 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B3CC120273 for <>; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 01:00:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.596
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.596 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B313Z3mrp-BX for <>; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 01:00:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BED0912026E for <>; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 01:00:18 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2020 01:00:17 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1580893217; bh=N9k2uqNjkkccKjBOlzyxKD2XunUJUxiP1Y7gvJz6qnQ=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=Jp+qZtW0HmO8NhXqje9K+b8x/AKUBqFNIaKSsdMy+u3VCdTuoDUZ4Znl9nBXjzCZt aFOc7qqXxLkdHsEPe9wQDyBziWf2iYSuYhXYdMZB1wGtLxOD/lI/p44NkcHrHJC5+F k+wRSxfInB4VU43vK5bX6c5U1hilXVSLA/oNGxmE=
From: Jana Iyengar <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3094/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] congestion window increase on every ACKed packet could result in bursty sends (#3094)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e3a8421d35eb_32af3ff6d34cd95c83163"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: janaiyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2020 09:00:20 -0000

I'm sympathetic to saying MUST pace, and I like the formatlization that @martinthomson suggests. I've heard some pushback on saying MUST pace in the past, but it might be worth giving it a shot again. @erickinnear @tfpauly : What do you think?

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: