Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] varint packet numbers (#989)
Brian Trammell <notifications@github.com> Thu, 03 May 2018 11:22 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2A72124E15 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 May 2018 04:22:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.605
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.605 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IHC9f12gV3LZ for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 May 2018 04:21:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-1.smtp.github.com (out-1.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.192]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1233012D959 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 May 2018 04:21:59 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 03 May 2018 04:21:58 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1525346518; bh=EnXOraSqBWLocaUwaDX/6J176yNR8r/CgrDeY/uI7jY=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=bGBCEKW9IzhrofqsQwJXeO1NI4lsEhvLcTQisb2eQfd0/RZYA5CZCv3P0SeFuY05S B40houkbwRoKWzaKZIxpZobjifT0z6jmnfhSTe4rdgDuxAi662vh94nFXhyBHYWyQ3 AlNBD/GBzD07hX5uqgVuHa2ZlenKd4EGS2HFoFMw=
From: Brian Trammell <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab7fb4a2a59ac923bba6c5b9ea3e601d2382d204cd92cf000000011702b2d692a169ce10a65f2b@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/989/386263215@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/989@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/989@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] varint packet numbers (#989)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5aeaf0d6380d7_64392b0d0b9f8f6051105e"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: britram
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/4t4FlDO2EbsOBzCkXulSVcG8cPE>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 May 2018 11:22:00 -0000
> That leads me to suggest that we at least consider: 0 followed by 7 bits; 10 followed by 14 bits; and 11 followed by 30 bits. Since the parser needs to be bespoke *anyway*, and there are indeed situations in which a 7 bit packet number is twice as useful as a six-bit one, I can write this up and we can have something concrete to argue about. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/989#issuecomment-386263215
- [quicwg/base-drafts] varint packet numbers (#989) Brian Trammell
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] varint packet numbers (#… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] varint packet numbers (#… Brian Trammell
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] varint packet numbers (#… ekr
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] varint packet numbers (#… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] varint packet numbers (#… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] varint packet numbers (#… Brian Trammell
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] varint packet numbers (#… martinduke
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] varint packet numbers (#… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] varint packet numbers (#… martinduke
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] varint packet numbers (#… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] varint packet numbers (#… Patrick McManus
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] varint packet numbers (#… Patrick McManus
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] varint packet numbers (#… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] varint packet numbers (#… martinduke
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] varint packet numbers (#… Patrick McManus
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] varint packet numbers (#… Brian Trammell
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] varint packet numbers (#… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] varint packet numbers (#… Brian Trammell
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] varint packet numbers (#… Brian Trammell
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] varint packet numbers (#… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] varint packet numbers (#… Brian Trammell
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] varint packet numbers (#… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] varint packet numbers (#… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] varint packet numbers (#… janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] varint packet numbers (#… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] varint packet numbers (#… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] varint packet numbers (#… Brian Trammell
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] varint packet numbers (#… Brian Trammell
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] varint packet numbers (#… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] varint packet numbers (#… Brian Trammell
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] varint packet numbers (#… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] varint packet numbers (#… Martin Thomson