[quicwg/base-drafts] Call OnPacketAckedCC() for in-flight packets, not just ack-eliciting (#2584)

Alessandro Ghedini <notifications@github.com> Tue, 02 April 2019 12:46 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A78221200FF for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 05:46:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HTCIklVZfsBL for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 05:45:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-2.smtp.github.com (out-2.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C75EB1200FE for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 05:45:58 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2019 05:45:56 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1554209156; bh=0qSv6jvtNWUjLaoBrFjYQ7LjHxYmCjxzasIkGY6BYSk=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:Subject:List-ID:List-Archive:List-Post: List-Unsubscribe:From; b=hfU7XTnnfaO8fi8v5Kguc7hJRxcyQptKdby27EpwidBCufyPvh7u/kCcPjMc0P1DI VuVnthVcVJPN6WPdx/BZsgoyhjuk/1zOsCdCbpeUV1Xgd6ROM/Oen8GOLC1fLxaJmB WrXRYpPQ3+qea9YhvKwXrFT2UCvFI9CUP9rxEInY=
From: Alessandro Ghedini <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab500a58a9bc4ef6bb129ba64ee812518d9cec476d92cf0000000118bb1b8492a169ce1985e8a7@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2584@github.com>
Subject: [quicwg/base-drafts] Call OnPacketAckedCC() for in-flight packets, not just ack-eliciting (#2584)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5ca35984d6303_77803fc7580d45bc198310"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ghedo
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/5bOcamTiakD1N1_-QXK5ndgyXxw>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2019 12:46:02 -0000

`OnPacketAcked()` calls `OnPacketAckedCC()` (which decreases `bytes_in_flight`)
only when `ack_eliciting` is true, however `OnPacketSentCC()` (which increases
`bytes_in_flight`) is called when `in_flight` is true.

Additionally, `OnPacketsLost()` decreases `bytes_in_flight` for in-flight
lost packets (not just ack-eliciting ones).

So it seems to follow that `OnPacketAcked()` should call `OnPacketAckedCC()`
for all in-flight packets.

---

The whole ack-eliciting vs in-flight distinction is pretty confusing to me (the only difference seems to be that in-flight includes packets with just PADDING, which are not ack-eliciting, is that correct?) so I may be totally wrong here.

But `bytes_in_flight` is increased and decreased based on two different conditions (`ack_eliciting` vs `in_flight`) which seems like a bug in the pseudo-code.

However if this is the intended behaviour, it's be useful to have a clarification as to why it is like that (the text doesn't seem to mention this) or a pointer to a previous discussion about this.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:

  https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2584

-- Commit Summary --

  * Call OnPacketAckedCC() for in-flight packets, not just ack-eliciting

-- File Changes --

    M draft-ietf-quic-recovery.md (2)

-- Patch Links --

https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2584.patch
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2584.diff

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2584