Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Mandating use of CN-ID is not modern practice (#4769)

kaduk <notifications@github.com> Wed, 20 January 2021 04:07 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F120C3A0CD2 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 20:07:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.804
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.804 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.25, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id smctQYVwpp6H for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 20:07:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-19.smtp.github.com (out-19.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.202]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A10723A0CCF for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 20:07:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from github.com (hubbernetes-node-209780d.va3-iad.github.net [10.48.112.65]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C8767E032D for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 20:07:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1611115644; bh=VCZiXY31zBGA6wJewKS3Xwp2LF2U+YcBxqEC9iF2RDI=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=dZm27rouUnPSrkEpTcfJDsD2lVV8ChJzu/6jjuVJENhSMMLvp0ilgonajcMSVBEt2 QmeVWWT9HQiWiu3XXSQBBnMBWvbItVu/ls6D6wUQlGGHm5LRmslAoFMlPadJqTOaCk TwTsWu9QdtTNRZ69kJyWbay1q3f1HtPzHU7QZUeg=
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 20:07:24 -0800
From: kaduk <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK6HONGUJWQEKT5B45F6COGXZEVBNHHC6EAH7Q@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4769/763315644@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4769@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4769@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Mandating use of CN-ID is not modern practice (#4769)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_6007ac7cc4b60_25921a0414375b"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kaduk
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/6HU1JPEO7sZ8bM0MiXoYONBq6Gc>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 04:07:27 -0000

There is some probably relevant discussion for http-semantics at https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/issues/404 (though as was noted recently the change that closed that issue had some issues of its own)

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4769#issuecomment-763315644