Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Stateless reset detection should be datagram-based (#3085)
Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Wed, 09 October 2019 23:50 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60F1E12004C for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 16:50:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZHkDfBEUZHsO for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 16:50:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-17.smtp.github.com (out-17.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20695120020 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 16:50:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-cde56e0.va3-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-cde56e0.va3-iad.github.net [10.48.25.52]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77C706E054D for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 16:50:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1570665029; bh=zBNmXJVe+Cqf8s1Q2C3WvTjQ/AEid3J9DjOWaOdRXOs=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=OtlaBo6S9vkoQOpBT4mCdzn3Y9Nl2vae6BOqd0wKrAR5iKGF0UEeUselUJMbHu0xV 9a/d+LtQUudLOFXUNWjCfqMXtQoz6OmWsGKeNXG4AVOG0wYTcXz0dt/cWAY3nk1sCn vReZN6CfsVKXwWpudAQB7a45yrP7OxzTKt7qJzLQ=
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2019 16:50:29 -0700
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK4QQFN4VQIZQU4VYA53VOSMLEVBNHHB4GHWDA@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3085/540253307@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3085@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3085@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Stateless reset detection should be datagram-based (#3085)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d9e724567a68_16533fbcdb6cd964139823"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/7CUofG1AGPS9c9oqkFvxypZjbH4>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2019 23:50:33 -0000
Not sure if this is editorial or not. We already require *sending* to be a whole datagram: > A stateless reset uses an entire UDP datagram, [...] So this could be seen to match things up. But it could require code changes in implementations, so I'm leaning toward `design`. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3085#issuecomment-540253307
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Stateless reset detection sh… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Stateless reset detectio… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Stateless reset detectio… Lars Eggert
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Stateless reset detectio… Martin Thomson