Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Unclear how short header packets should be matched to connections (#3006)

Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Wed, 04 September 2019 23:51 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A03F120813 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 16:51:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.445
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.445 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_TEMPERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cT187FVLQjLs for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 16:51:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-2.smtp.github.com (out-2.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 195A212007A for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 16:51:33 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2019 16:51:31 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1567641092; bh=tCRyzCMKr3CzfTWU0Yb8RQBvLMzTgYUdKJ+hDoemwpU=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=uGYtb7b6K0ru0ow6y5hwLdxVu+FMXLiEIu83ywssHj59ce5E72dyrFdKORgmAGEVf rSRSU1VW13j1rVZEod/LhWx55rYsgCb8DQ5dzDl04AAItbWhP0j+CKKnYKqLNaoauJ Ef8gaNv2+TxlAwufaMx9FDY+QdCoqbW4gV9jpGug=
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK6JAUJ7RAU33Y34TCV3PVZHHEVBNHHB2LDIAM@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3006/528136882@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3006@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3006@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Unclear how short header packets should be matched to connections (#3006)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d704e03ece7a_242f3fdcaa8cd9642130cd"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/7Djx7CEKqCr00tUxWZ6kTi498Ck>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2019 23:51:35 -0000

> Hosts try to associate a packet with an existing connection. If the packet has a Destination Connection ID corresponding to an existing connection, QUIC processes that packet accordingly.

I'll concede that this should probably say "processes that packet for the identified connection" or something along those lines, but I don't see how this is ambiguous otherwise.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3006#issuecomment-528136882