Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Close in response to invalid CONNECTION_CLOSE (#3230)

Martin Thomson <> Tue, 12 November 2019 05:46 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99DD81200C7 for <>; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 21:46:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.382
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fhgvV0NkbIXe for <>; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 21:46:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DEDF12001E for <>; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 21:46:00 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 21:45:59 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1573537559; bh=8XXOwpl7G/RvDePvP4hP+SMmFrPXY/3UWjr1wCFaLuY=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=HHdym7X0rjS1mtlemvPsz4OZKnrjixKG5MYKxZlKLamcEREOVP/KHrXxp12f0kpJU Bxf4hsEcAxPMIb3aUtsKxyP18a6PXwG8sKxzP04La5tki4ymHyeWec71LivMXj6xrk gB3FUBgSOSdRcBmHNC15e2jZOoF7I4aJ2NtALnqI=
From: Martin Thomson <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3230/review/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Close in response to invalid CONNECTION_CLOSE (#3230)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5dca471751a68_e2b3ffde94cd96c7588e5"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 05:46:02 -0000

martinthomson commented on this pull request.

> @@ -2709,8 +2710,10 @@ frame risks a peer missing the first such packet.  The only mechanism available
 to an endpoint that continues to receive data for a terminated connection is to
 use the stateless reset process ({{stateless-reset}}).
-An endpoint that receives an invalid CONNECTION_CLOSE frame MUST NOT signal the
-existence of the error to its peer.
+An endpoint that receives an invalid CONNECTION_CLOSE frame MUST treat the

One that has an reason phrase that overruns the packet would do it.  I can't see any other reason.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: