[quicwg/base-drafts] Use of "in order" might be misunderstood as an ordering requirement (3) (#4040)

Gorry Fairhurst <notifications@github.com> Thu, 20 August 2020 08:46 UTC

Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 01:46:19 -0700
From: Gorry Fairhurst <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK3OYYDGDNHVPR42SKV5JIMVXEVBNHHCRLVNUQ@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4040@github.com>
Subject: [quicwg/base-drafts] Use of "in order" might be misunderstood as an ordering requirement (3) (#4040)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5f3e385b9400b_ae51964534230"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/7LFMiEDrnYn5FTKloVZlqdLgGUY>

There are other uses of "in order" that the editors may like to address to avoid potential misunderstanding:

This also is potentially misread: /An adversarial sender might intentionally send fragments of stream data in order to cause disproportionate receive buffer memory commitment and/or creation of a large and inefficient data structure./ and could be /An adversarial sender might intentionally send fragments of stream data that cause disproportionate receive buffer memory commitment and/or creation of a large and inefficient data structure./


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4040

[quicwg/base-drafts] Use of "in order" might be m… Gorry Fairhurst
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Use of "in order" might … Martin Thomson