[quicwg/base-drafts] Ben Kaduk's QPACK Comment 6 (#4796)

Lucas Pardue <notifications@github.com> Thu, 21 January 2021 14:21 UTC

Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 06:21:22 -0800
From: Lucas Pardue <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK5IJEYTNVG7SV4THZF6CVXOFEVBNHHC6J65RA@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4796@github.com>
Subject: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ben Kaduk's QPACK Comment 6 (#4796)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_60098de226ad7_4e1a041371ba"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/95QNtVQfXXZz9-pprTLxnif_lns>

@kaduk said

> Appendix C
>
> It might be worth a brief mention of the API contracts for (e.g.) the
> encode*() functions.  The second argument of encodeInteger() as "the
> byte value used to fill in the bits of the first byte that are not
> consumed by the trailing N-prefix integer" is particularly hard to infer
> (if it's even the correct inference).

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4796

[quicwg/base-drafts] Ben Kaduk's QPACK Comment 6 … Lucas Pardue
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ben Kaduk's QPACK Commen… Lars Eggert
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ben Kaduk's QPACK Commen… afrind
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ben Kaduk's QPACK Commen… afrind