Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] kDefaultInitialRtt too large (#752)

Lars Eggert <notifications@github.com> Wed, 30 August 2017 13:58 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D32B132A65 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 06:58:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.402
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.402 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mrnCGZ44RW0i for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 06:58:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o10.sgmail.github.com (o10.sgmail.github.com [167.89.101.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0126132E8D for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 06:58:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=bmUHx/f5fuyZfcoFnmfSbtIdZa4=; b=H6u96EdDYj1vhkVM +4a1cRhaJCCmgtaBC41sDkQs5VY5hzwrJlRs6e/MNKI5kMhSwuYtixKbu24X8G8c VY4H8ZQQHTHBZsOxIDfdZSNSx/FmN7rGV0XogRN+cY/MyAffAZGYpqdZf5/QjsHX ZYX5nyz26MsEs9aXggXfIFgYFRY=
Received: by filter0947p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0947p1mdw1-24744-59A6C46E-3B 2017-08-30 13:58:06.801309828 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.16]) by ismtpd0037p1mdw1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id nbBgck8uQbSOPd_yUdHTEw for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 13:58:06.724 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 13:58:07 +0000
From: Lars Eggert <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab3144949563f7b79de54ee05cda321d41c2607a0892cf0000000115be866e92a169ce0f1cc61a@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/752/325998700@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/752@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/752@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] kDefaultInitialRtt too large (#752)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_59a6c46e6cad9_2e7c3fd87657bc30878d3"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: larseggert
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak332vbA3VZVJ1tiMj5Nc3Q+dkh7rDYr9TBi16 mrr+UXvAWLLopp7wU4aF2nJLo97t92qUsembGGjYGTesDieb+zdKdqHByHRaS9mKsRLjzuqh1QwG+3 w7ev7d8+y3t5afUkK7cFbcmE+qvCNgXSZeih5gQf9CE/dO/MWdKG1Z0m7RjpsoEjHMMgUw9VVbM8Sq I=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/9Z5T2dWr0H_PzFOuBRPs8vWci3M>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 13:58:10 -0000

> For QUIC - I think that's backwards.

I tend to agree, that's why I phrased it this way. But I also think that 100ms is too short. If 300ms has proven an OK value for TCP for browsers, that might be a good candidate value here? It would cover most terrestrial paths.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/752#issuecomment-325998700