IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Optimistic ACK in early handshake (#2192)

Magnus Westerlund <notifications@github.com> Wed, 19 December 2018 09:23 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 737A0130DC8 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 01:23:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.447
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.447 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.065, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mG_15prQcp4t for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 01:23:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from o4.sgmail.github.com (o4.sgmail.github.com [192.254.112.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A4A5130DEF for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 01:23:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=1AyDnzGU4gztF81FR7mEWvHZo6A=; b=sY0Cn9kLYjOaZ2Pk fU4+owiYSFOFktgDn9LmBqvtJtmKbVMqJGa3K6aXeZNM/rJH8WjiSmsUm7BkvpZk yd5T6xjUq6jCc0MgN6Nc7jIbHb5rt7aWnwuzf6Lk5gwityiT4vX5x/aawaT7iw4N abB30oyNlFzBb6j8PE8+QcFD9nw=
Received: by filter0590p1iad2.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0590p1iad2-9334-5C1A0E17-1C 2018-12-19 09:23:35.800989967 +0000 UTC m=+140560.072107269
Received: from github-lowworker-dcd58f3.cp1-iad.github.net (unknown [192.30.252.33]) by ismtpd0033p1iad2.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id 7WeoHc_TSp2kZn436m5sIA for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 09:23:35.951 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from github.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by github-lowworker-dcd58f3.cp1-iad.github.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC5562412F0 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 01:23:35 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 09:23:35 +0000
From: Magnus Westerlund <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab3ad1c749b0f775b27c355a80c17c6888bc37089392cf000000011831d01792a169ce1753c928@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2192/448526466@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2192@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2192@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Optimistic ACK in early handshake (#2192)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c1a0e17eaf99_7713fa7182d45c0153527e"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: gloinul
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak1OsdMT3zYLziiTfpBq4j/ck7VAn+18oAPLQ1 bzjL9uH9CZOBSonKzuvT2Y7vzu3uDYmsGUD97eFmicNbsHGDeUT1kO2EFOOS0YUqHXUtEbltL/bkYG krZqtlx67xeiyCTT/7AB1qGkA7lt9nGsRt6qqpKzpc21eJO/4y5E4CNlnnmS5GXNyUbJfW1RF5h6YY Y=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/9tZ-f_8pukoq7wi9EqZm-BOxMpM>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 09:23:38 -0000

Does optimistic ACKs really work in QUIC? I thought renege on ACKs where not allowed, but I can't find any text on that currently. Thus, if you actually have a packet loss, the whole connection will be screwed as you can't get retransmission of the lost data. 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2192#issuecomment-448526466

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email