IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] recovery: clarifying the priority of Probe packet contents (#3780)

Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Tue, 23 June 2020 09:13 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C7E43A180D for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 02:13:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.009
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EtJIC8i91Nro for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 02:13:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-20.smtp.github.com (out-20.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.203]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 283E23A180C for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 02:13:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-fb56993.ac4-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-fb56993.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.19.31]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A6918C1E85 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 02:13:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1592903628; bh=6wc0JIH/qcNFi12zOi9zH7GK/FDjbOSF7FMgN+67aug=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=obDX2BXxcgR5j10ULMnXqT12c4hKNR5KhksFD986yOVRfqmNPCnMQrIX8yI/uSOJH xATYS9dGs1d00DPXSAqv7tYayXE/WiOSno+Tj46dx4AOOyrQE9JmDc4TUkcnR5v6kU +GFTHW7x9eZe3ZPclMHT8UQdY+xiR0zgdn4/g5tM=
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 02:13:48 -0700
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK5WEIZQYWOORM7WMIV47WUMZEVBNHHCMOWLJI@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3780/648016355@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3780@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3780@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] recovery: clarifying the priority of Probe packet contents (#3780)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5ef1c7cc6c2c0_53ab3fdd994cd9641467ae"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/CDDGUBtPX35b7R5hnPvHqq2ej28>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 09:13:51 -0000

> This seems right to me; we're retransmitting frames, not packets.

Well... We retransmit information, not frames or packets. :)  Those people who do retransmit frames are not strictly *wrong*, but they are also not going to get the best results either.

Kazuho has provided what I think is the definitive response here.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3780#issuecomment-648016355

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email