Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] NUM_PLACEHOLDERS MUST NOT be zero (#2753)

ianswett <notifications@github.com> Mon, 10 June 2019 19:00 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF3931202A1 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 12:00:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.605
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.605 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D-9AjeatsemP for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 12:00:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-17.smtp.github.com (out-17.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A24B120265 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 12:00:25 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 12:00:24 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1560193224; bh=xgLC6ALG6w8oLyZvGEyd5tHaeYTbSuXkQFnKWbKjT2A=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=JdHaql6gAt3XzRgB5QMeNxUmc2kLVx/3RPhKF65Ey56mK23KUZ+j0p20U3AGc6MIC yAZdNbLUya4Q9UjEcbqLjEa+jyNOsKrSl+NBf8gREVgT92EiSiY8/xnjPPwHObe3yg vFO7Samsez7hqAOFz2wxAF8fSYB75+31MDrK6yVE=
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJKYCCJB4QZTV72F4UIF3BPNUREVBNHHBVK26ZM@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2753/500547860@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2753@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2753@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] NUM_PLACEHOLDERS MUST NOT be zero (#2753)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5cfea8c835a3_25973f99f88cd96816745e"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/CREvuBHYJzB91iuv_bxqwrEGfLk>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 19:00:32 -0000

I'm really happy that we have a fairly clear idea of what the goal is in terms of prioritization.  There's certainly a bit of wiggle room and room for experimentation, but I do believe we have rough consensus that we want a mechanism that can accomplish what's in @kazuho post.

As @kazuho says, if that's true, then I don't think we need placeholders to accomplish that prioritization.  And if that's true, then there's no critical dependency on a non-zero number of placeholders.



-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2753#issuecomment-500547860