Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why must we not use post-handshake client auth? (#2294)

Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Tue, 22 January 2019 23:26 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6569B131196 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 15:26:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.935
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.935 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-4.553, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dVhSTM8zaxDn for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 15:26:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-3.smtp.github.com (out-3.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6E70131191 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 15:26:13 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 15:26:12 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1548199573; bh=HMsQLCgeelC8GYZI9g1tl4ubT2N+6/Zzs/QnAUh8rNk=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=zUDicb1w4EoRgkJM0zW31ROj2tyXLYBcaPxi5yrD/F6L0dJwSEJvfNSGDayV7lLAz hV8EjUNGg9NzOsR8BZ+rcn6V16XAkxctXmYXwfqYcfWYR3NOHTeQ7xx4Tj/Z9JK+Yp XYbU6EgWhMV1C/HQom9O587KwY/WVi7rOqg2tWnw=
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abe19a603c7bd3ff3c90984d8385cce634bd0f71bc92cf00000001185f689492a169ce179b352f@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issue/2294/issue_event/2090249146@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2294@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2294@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why must we not use post-handshake client auth? (#2294)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c47a694f385d_29ca3ff4286d45b4310299"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/DBRiZ1iDU5KwyVNDTBmFktFL8e8>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 23:26:16 -0000

Closed #2294.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2294#event-2090249146