[quicwg/base-drafts] Path validation should be done even for what looks like NAT rebinding (#2579)
Igor Lubashev <notifications@github.com> Mon, 01 April 2019 11:56 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98CDF12010D for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 04:56:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.384
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.384 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f3cndF3LC7kE for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 04:56:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-5.smtp.github.com (out-5.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80469120127 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 04:56:48 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2019 04:56:47 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1554119807; bh=0NBlg1HMMeaEhwrRUPHZbAYYe9MhFgkxxt6KeZOa6ew=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:Subject:List-ID:List-Archive:List-Post: List-Unsubscribe:From; b=zeKQqVT6Hkcy6kh6KJleid5tMYegwgZn1RoSYkd3DMruv9on+e43qdnU/ZCNkhGE6 zToZoUTWwY8KLGq8rUPRIRFUBdrnovdMKGfrI3NpRaKZaQYVFAlclZXQsqKZRTQSjH U537/HhaljWrULGeK/q2bvusj5bFTLXBH91yDeXs=
From: Igor Lubashev <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab0cc01685278d9630136231338982f965082c7a4992cf0000000118b9be7f92a169ce197da202@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2579@github.com>
Subject: [quicwg/base-drafts] Path validation should be done even for what looks like NAT rebinding (#2579)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5ca1fc7f1f71a_50b73f87c78d45bc1297aa"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: igorlord
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/E67-BMyGlLX1ozjnjkrSkFEU1xo>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2019 11:56:58 -0000
Section 9 (Connection migration) says: > NAT rebinding is not connection migration as defined in this section, though an endpoint SHOULD perform path validation (Section 8.2) if it detects a change in the IP address of its peer. If the server does not perform path validation upon a port change and no ip address change, this becomes a possible DoS vector for an attacker behind the same NAT as the client. The attacker must just capture and replay the packet from its own address, securing a new outgoing port on the NAT. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2579
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Path validation should be do… Igor Lubashev
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Path validation should b… Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Path validation should b… David Schinazi
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Path validation should b… Igor Lubashev
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Path validation should b… erickinnear
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Path validation should b… David Schinazi
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Path validation should b… Jana Iyengar