Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remembering transport parameters (#3434)

Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com> Tue, 25 February 2020 15:47 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 493913A0F30 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 07:47:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.482
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.482 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IdLo7JNPbs_8 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 07:47:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-20.smtp.github.com (out-20.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.203]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C399E3A0CF4 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 07:47:35 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 07:47:34 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1582645654; bh=4LN4hSQkCPoaP8n9LwDTvw1PNIX27a8806o5xorf810=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=SXO6zuAFrpa+SRRm7dIm25zSv5UpYD5JVHTAJ8BDAYOf7fEzF277ixBvB+7qrEZGB yaa88lLcL4WQUIO++9PvtL8w+NVhsj56pEF+LwaWJQwXChCPv+9dYf8pzv6GSrpVXH 1QTP1/Svt5Jt4dre/vBJFOspyIH5d27prqCBOEMY=
From: Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK6KIAADTSSLCNJCL4F4MJ2BNEVBNHHCC3UEJM@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3434/590933987@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3434@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3434@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remembering transport parameters (#3434)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e554196d5ce7_611d3fa398ccd9601137c3"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: MikeBishop
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/G756v_TBKTK58xlF6PdKYdxyjQs>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 15:47:37 -0000

>     3. Is the server allowed to advertise a lower max_packet_size in its new TPs? I can imagine some use cases to motivate a "yes", and it has the advantage of being what the text already says.

> the server MUST NOT reduce any limits or alter any values that might be violated by the client with its 0-RTT data

I think it's fairly clear that the client *could* violate the server's max packet size in 0-RTT so this would seem to apply.  But since the penalty for that is dropped packets, rather than connection errors, I agree that it shouldn't have to apply.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3434#issuecomment-590933987