IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] loss recovery of crypto packets is less aggressive, not more aggressive (#2435)

Marten Seemann <notifications@github.com> Mon, 11 February 2019 11:26 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3860130E8C for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 03:26:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.383
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.383 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I8iJpvQjKEoX for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 03:26:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-6.smtp.github.com (out-6.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E514130E8A for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 03:26:06 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 03:26:05 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1549884365; bh=eedLwCZ1NQ5CA+uSSmULJFwigmp+S++HKvmyUdeTH9A=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=q6fws77ihfy+sRBGwJXxxncq9qpnGdqDahlUj9ekBmHPsxW3GAjGCBjxwbNXfloBM pd5QEm3vtrpYC73BjWydA28OdgEfu7Dppcl2P0NaLTPSU2JpbFmKJT8LKgvfIALNq1 V8wvPqLXSThWKM/gq7TdUl+Kj+8QdApbk3IiADg0=
From: Marten Seemann <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4aba03d9f0501c1ecdf9c462449d443062462667b3692cf0000000118791dcd92a169ce184a02c3@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2435/462295160@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2435@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2435@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] loss recovery of crypto packets is less aggressive, not more aggressive (#2435)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c615bcda845_68e93fa020ad45bc724f"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: marten-seemann
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/H2JKoTfiKr6DwikJgRVq1YbXtgA>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 11:26:08 -0000

Why do we need a second timer? Wouldn't it be sufficient to have another `loss_time` variable for crypto packets?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2435#issuecomment-462295160

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email