Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] RTTVar is not really a variance (#3223)
ianswett <notifications@github.com> Tue, 19 November 2019 15:12 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AF6812092C for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 07:12:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZZ8qkIp_B0Is for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 07:12:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-7.smtp.github.com (out-7.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 174161200C4 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 07:12:38 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 07:12:37 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1574176357; bh=rXKa1Q7o2MSLVzNE+yvcALZbXgePe1boBFmGV8XkP3Y=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=SZU3NL7oV3HVGgGKNsRpc6rKAPlcuxwRhXlL+JK7OX2qzWhaPWkynv7ewK01Ikc21 csvgL9+s+KYhoPpAYbafdfraLg5RGf3n+aCZCl+KeaNdnijS9qNc5oqVSBTeAFt/tK oGbQ+6jFJoLh5vvW2rm1ZZJ4m+18V5q/AoPqMoDE=
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJKYSCNTQCQJ33JMBRF534E4OLEVBNHHB6EODQY@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3223/c555551917@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3223@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3223@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] RTTVar is not really a variance (#3223)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5dd406655b847_691f3fe79dccd96c13865f"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/H4S-hVlAnQroNgmUsXuQV67hDfU>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 15:12:40 -0000
In both sentences, min_rtt and smoothed_rtt are described in technically accurate terms, so I think it makes sense to describe rttvar as a mean deviation, because that's the most technically accurate term. I also understand the need for consistency, so if you have suggestions on how to improve that without removing the technical description, it'd be appreciated. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3223#issuecomment-555551917
- [quicwg/base-drafts] RTTVar is not really a varia… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] RTTVar is not really a v… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] RTTVar is not really a v… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] RTTVar is not really a v… martinduke
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] RTTVar is not really a v… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] RTTVar is not really a v… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] RTTVar is not really a v… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] RTTVar is not really a v… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] RTTVar is not really a v… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] RTTVar is not really a v… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] RTTVar is not really a v… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] RTTVar is not really a v… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] RTTVar is not really a v… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] RTTVar is not really a v… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] RTTVar is not really a v… ianswett