Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Retransmitting ACK frames can inflate RTT (#3048)
ianswett <notifications@github.com> Wed, 18 September 2019 01:49 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D201120131 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 18:49:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.382
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kP25P65MuqOH for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 18:49:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-2.smtp.github.com (out-2.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B976112012E for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 18:49:09 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 18:49:09 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1568771349; bh=6Fg0T8KEx9v1SxbAcQJCpwYv5w1pNe7P7PxGv+ug4Uw=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=TrzzrCs1kG81zILh4VaN95j7TrMMPtidLshXOGtNb/a3T+5YHo62buB8i7S3PDZ7c uipjRX7nD8bLbQzMBKIiFfeiEZlf2DuV81snVUzxO3inZOUnmQyi32yBNpIaY2u6Yj B+dCfhNk1M+pUz8vHrJKSoj0ZO0Ef5+yWQ8etwaU=
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK3JLCELRDIQJ3WTPKN3R3G2LEVBNHHB274N7I@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3048/review/289631857@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3048@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3048@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Retransmitting ACK frames can inflate RTT (#3048)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d818d15fc73_1d473f86b54cd9681336d6"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/HTEw2jb8lUwFWW0bkcpeLb9utiQ>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 01:49:12 -0000
ianswett commented on this pull request.
> @@ -291,6 +291,13 @@ are received within an RTT. As suggested in {{?RFC6298}}, doing so might result
in inadequate history in smoothed_rtt and rttvar. Ensuring that RTT estimates
retain sufficient history is an open research question.
+### Retransmitted ACK frames
+
+Section 13.3 of {{QUIC-TRANSPORT}} recommends sending the most recent set of
+acknowledgements in ACK frames, but if ACK frames are retransmitted, an inflated
I originally wrote that, but it's likely to be inflated anyway, particularly if max_ack_delay is < RTT.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3048#discussion_r325452115
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Retransmitting ACK frames ca… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Retransmitting ACK frame… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Retransmitting ACK frame… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Retransmitting ACK frame… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Retransmitting ACK frame… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Retransmitting ACK frame… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Retransmitting ACK frame… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Retransmitting ACK frame… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Retransmitting ACK frame… ianswett