Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Recommend of per-connection ID randomness for spin bit (#2628)

Mike Bishop <> Thu, 18 April 2019 18:41 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1ADC120187 for <>; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 11:41:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.001
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Po5H0kTHC2T9 for <>; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 11:41:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5D2E120151 for <>; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 11:41:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=z5pp592mzVWDIX/vfIHV1JwKIJ4=; b=V4xMEy3iyJvo0c6T wRCcoLPlH/sfoR9RpzlIKPAW18J4kd7oCFS1PMTi6rSICe7m6dVV5+wXsiGhZKoN dsbWkmyr7vFGleRydSQX7Ji9CSeAAgJ4+Qt1awXzIQnrUDBJTdei9KdLkcCpq2ny WDqjL8tfNfHSUOp7KVOwqoPmfNM=
Received: by with SMTP id filter0590p1iad2-3720-5CB8C4C1-46 2019-04-18 18:41:05.74591436 +0000 UTC m=+846404.198613264
Received: from (unknown []) by (SG) with ESMTP id -pMUACaVQn292VpTfTZ8Rw for <>; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 18:41:05.708 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FC1F3E0D96 for <>; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 11:41:05 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 18:41:05 +0000
From: Mike Bishop <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2628/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Recommend of per-connection ID randomness for spin bit (#2628)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5cb8c4c197133_cd53f9c932cd96c5802ec"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: MikeBishop
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak0Va6aS77srXy9EB5+1oss/kmua8FUFXqBDMI 4yU6rqDZN4AmOc+QBEH/FJe19f+Cgi+ocdo+nuvJx/fxrFHVuZT6E3ZSCMKwbCS3t+wSvTFYh93XUr WsNipp56A5cFwq36afFjgdr9KpnD4Q02nYQNZGoD80QdfsxHfGdgf0wUDHNITIFRa3ShEXQCb4cafk o=
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 18:41:09 -0000

@mnot, @larseggert, the proposed change here was discussed [previously]( on #2564, but wasn't acted upon.  I read the previous comment as saying she disagrees that there was consensus to merge #2564 without addressing that discussion.  That makes this a larger issue than a single PR, and belongs to the chairs.

The proposed change is *technically* editorial, because it's guidance rather than a hard protocol requirement.  However, given the contentious nature of everything related to the spin bit, I'm inclined to think that this is worth at least running by the list and tracking with an issue.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: