Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Largest Reference isn't the right concept (#2110)
Bence Béky <notifications@github.com> Wed, 26 December 2018 18:49 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DBD21311DC for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Dec 2018 10:49:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.084
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.084 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.065, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.979, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T8UT700K4yru for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Dec 2018 10:49:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-2.smtp.github.com (out-2.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98C651311C4 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Dec 2018 10:49:40 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2018 10:49:39 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1545850179; bh=XwVMhuFPjt6EtDxUYcKuADNisb8h4AhA+q4BmIhlyho=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=toBN5Cf5CdMTTlRrTRLwRb099wABf0FMgK8iQxbstcsomQunvko3XCrTC9AHgA++j KZJYStW3lqxxc0tdam3JL3ZNsv777P7CUg35KCVOJjQATWXJG11WEtSakrKVmdv2jX hqKGTwPLmNg/bdY5c6GZDZIoVoK+FkhNHeT+8+GQ=
From: Bence Béky <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab04957dce7c3112450c49801c8bb0d620eb258c0e92cf00000001183b8f4392a169ce17392e66@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2110/450008152@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2110@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2110@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Largest Reference isn't the right concept (#2110)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c23cd43861cb_18463faaceed45b4847393"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: bencebeky
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/JvVcs4jcIse1oO6TsWXpIobLvxM>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2018 18:49:42 -0000
QPACK is currently inconsistent in that static table indexing is explicitly defined to be zero-based, while dynamic table absolute indexing is explicitly one-based, see https://quicwg.org/base-drafts/draft-ietf-quic-qpack.html#table-static https://quicwg.org/base-drafts/draft-ietf-quic-qpack.html#indexing I enthusiastically support PR #2111 and also changing absolute indexing to zero-based. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2110#issuecomment-450008152
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Largest Reference isn't the … Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Largest Reference isn't … afrind
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Largest Reference isn't … Bence Béky
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Largest Reference isn't … Dmitri Tikhonov
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Largest Reference isn't … csillagasz
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Largest Reference isn't … Bence Béky
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Largest Reference isn't … Dmitri Tikhonov
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Largest Reference isn't … Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Largest Reference isn't … Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Largest Reference isn't … afrind