Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Move wasteful packet stuff to -transport (#2896)

Joshua Koo <> Mon, 15 July 2019 19:01 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB89F120235 for <>; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 12:01:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YzmPGpTIJut5 for <>; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 12:01:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9DB6120273 for <>; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 12:01:26 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 12:01:25 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1563217286; bh=Gn9jNJpsa48NngttTDPxT0KsNbGn2vs4asIEKja/NxY=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=TYsypRwvkl5XNOUcIgEngnch8MBbTvD0zc3Hb0f4M5mxud4ZZMSknBllg+cEUxhxy Q+lD/HtFBDbc6t4AjZvngKzLK/cLVCbSPV5W99WeVLy7/fAVL53tLOu9DkRwOPHIrP KjaKfxrLRe/c+4XEMhpWKLM9lzwfFOQK4JmCu+2Y=
From: Joshua Koo <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2896/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Move wasteful packet stuff to -transport (#2896)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d2ccd85ecab0_5fa53fba326cd960932a6"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: zz85
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 19:01:34 -0000

Thanks for improving the section's clarity.

As a follow up question, when implementations decide that excessive packets is an attack, is there a recommended actionable (eg. sending reset, dropping the connection, do nothing) or would that be up for implementer's discretion?

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: