Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Mandate using a new connection ID on migration (#2413)
Igor Lubashev <notifications@github.com> Mon, 04 February 2019 23:37 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2302F129A87 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 15:37:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -11.149
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.149 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-4.553, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lOaXskEjQpHh for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 15:37:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-3.smtp.github.com (out-3.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CFAF129508 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 15:37:10 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2019 15:37:09 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1549323429; bh=1lRsiEDYcNvKA5j19x565EW4zE+A8V8PUinQZ7F2CBY=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=xL3wejuq6ERstqipUAfn9S3M6EqQFUC8dLXaCNf2IkWLGhX4c84KH5SWOCrAzbVt9 8pY/gUcA82T3pPaApBF00VScbNVlW0yszrIEdK3AW+gqWdmPQzbwIYq30Dl1KfTECf IyB3SFMYynmPsMf4HamIMNXvdamRYuf8ou6gSKGo=
From: Igor Lubashev <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab3243b45eeddd11be39305996415e4c9e84ed245892cf0000000118708ea592a169ce183ba2c6@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2413/460457005@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2413@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2413@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Mandate using a new connection ID on migration (#2413)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c58cca5335de_b5d3ffcc80d45bc7972b"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: igorlord
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/KbnzZJBUs20WxKkD2r8olV6-mLI>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2019 23:37:12 -0000
I do not think it is wise to prohibit connection migration, when there are no available connection IDs. This is something that the client is fully capable of deciding for itself -- to migrate using an old connection ID or to reconnect instead. I would go with MUST use, if there is one available. Otherwise, privacy-conscious clients SHOULD reconnect. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2413#issuecomment-460457005
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Mandate using a new connecti… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Mandate using a new conn… Igor Lubashev
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Mandate using a new conn… erickinnear
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Mandate using a new conn… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Mandate using a new conn… Igor Lubashev
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Mandate using a new conn… David Schinazi
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Mandate using a new conn… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Mandate using a new conn… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Mandate using a new conn… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Mandate using a new conn… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Mandate using a new conn… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Mandate using a new conn… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Mandate using a new conn… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Mandate using a new conn… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Mandate using a new conn… Martin Thomson