Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Deduplication window suggested by RFC 4303 is insufficient (#3692)

Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com> Mon, 25 May 2020 06:02 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F3243A0BF0 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 May 2020 23:02:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.009
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zwid9K1gMDpj for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 May 2020 23:01:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-17.smtp.github.com (out-17.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 056EC3A0477 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 May 2020 23:01:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-cde56e0.va3-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-cde56e0.va3-iad.github.net [10.48.25.52]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCEF46E01FC for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 May 2020 23:01:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1590386516; bh=eJw/qCo38S20uPWbC03Y+cgHNxRy1t41XE4ZKAixOPg=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=bEc9wlU+1393yeh9a92aLaB09sECkq3bDusRQcnJzOTJsN163opVimwLY4AlnPBPX /0XBjNhABLhI88hk9PBeqE4ovf/NUfPy6kgE3g6JoWpYrYnnAwqV9e6xybSQK7h3YD XqoWB2kqX2I3B1Dzf8bm3NkqSPDki0+OYcJCra28=
Date: Sun, 24 May 2020 23:01:56 -0700
From: Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK26LJI2VEGXPF6XVYV425AFJEVBNHHCKMO44M@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3692/633392953@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3692@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3692@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Deduplication window suggested by RFC 4303 is insufficient (#3692)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5ecb5f54bbaf7_44d23f8050acd964404f4"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/KrTVFtw2XMZTGu1geXjUSngAj6g>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 06:02:01 -0000

As a fix, I think we should remove reference to RFC 4303, and state that an endpoint SHOULD be capable of deduplicating packets that are received across more than half the largest RTT that the endpoint intends to support.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3692#issuecomment-633392953