Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ian's suggestion (7119afb)
Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com> Tue, 27 August 2019 07:36 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6031D12004A for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 00:36:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id owkLBxSipS9X for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 00:36:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-3.smtp.github.com (out-3.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30927120018 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 00:36:25 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 00:36:24 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1566891384; bh=sMKdJcx+aCF/R35+26Q/R8iK0JdsfDy/NKWX9xylKfU=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=RQ81Y1vYv19f/UslLvNC3/9zCojfdvkyoIOpzjeCuQ+SzXGYYrXiyXR0ueh1Hk+0B TqxpibeKIFeSLhUwbnkftI+hSBRgRLaqlCY60/c1l5HnsYowUp/stiSdhP4taf8D3b 35tgfZ9vMyGB/WvM5m9+mShQDOHMHgb65j9SI8OM=
From: Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK3KU4DBDO5SWQ7DJYN3OIH7REVBMPHAEE5PEE@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/commit/7119afb175aecc071b73857f349d6c258e266795/34844449@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/commit/7119afb175aecc071b73857f349d6c258e266795@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/commit/7119afb175aecc071b73857f349d6c258e266795@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ian's suggestion (7119afb)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d64dd784f31f_60dd3fb374ccd9601115fe"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/M3z80VyaKjAXsk8zXVbO53ITvZo>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 07:36:26 -0000
I like that the text we have now - a load balancer can limit it's supported length, assuming that it is not longer than the limit imposed by QUIC vN. Assuming that is the case, it would be possible for such a middlebox to forward the packet to the correct backend server regardless of the QUIC version. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/commit/7119afb175aecc071b73857f349d6c258e266795#commitcomment-34844449