Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] 0-RTT flow control limits can't be increased (#2360)
Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Thu, 31 January 2019 00:52 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A28091286D9 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 16:52:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -11.149
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.149 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-4.553, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eji3zQgA-kl9 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 16:52:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-6.smtp.github.com (out-6.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C515C126CC7 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 16:52:16 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 16:52:15 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1548895935; bh=mtRKPG1obVsWa8rdCFhRFFCFKnOAgG/de6yJLC/SWhY=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=enOuhCTrmLMUB8suAlWymanW4J92unleN0KDM43yR9NVxVnX6G1qBgLfUxlh1gGTr 3ADEvdrbIRDTE7iCR0mCGryMVQidceGMk0VnsSoEADPn/KwI7aCwEv85qw/zsOS+Ov OdGEILlFT5WmxERksVeR2LFyoBVwJr9DpeFeO82Q=
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abcbe53db4b6a00509bbd1d8b0916e57fdb6aab68592cf00000001186a08bf92a169ce17f58684@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2360/459171200@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2360@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2360@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] 0-RTT flow control limits can't be increased (#2360)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c5246bf69b87_51743fe2a6ed45b875158"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/N2D5PXIqzVzI5aOFUFJgEXI5f7M>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 00:52:19 -0000
Tokyo conclusion: we will prohibit the client from sending more than the remembered flow control limits (nothing from the new transport parameters or 1-RTT packets can be used to increase the window). Some debate about requiring servers to enforce this requirement, decided not to require the generation of a connection error. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2360#issuecomment-459171200
- [quicwg/base-drafts] 0-RTT flow control lmits can… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] 0-RTT flow control limit… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] 0-RTT flow control limit… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] 0-RTT flow control limit… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] 0-RTT flow control limit… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] 0-RTT flow control limit… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] 0-RTT flow control limit… Jana Iyengar