Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Make SNI more clearly mandatory (#3326)

[ekr <[e-mail]>]

On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 10:22 AM David Schinazi <[e-mail]>
wrote:

> *@DavidSchinazi* commented on this pull request.
> ------------------------------
>
> In draft-ietf-quic-http.md
> <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3326#discussion_r364375027>:
>
> > @@ -312,11 +317,14 @@ an explicit port.
>
>  ## Connection Establishment {#connection-establishment}
>
> -HTTP/3 relies on QUIC as the underlying transport.  The QUIC version being used
> -MUST use TLS version 1.3 or greater as its handshake protocol.  HTTP/3 clients
> -MUST indicate the target domain name during the TLS handshake. This may be done
> -using the Server Name Indication (SNI) {{!RFC6066}} extension to TLS or using
> -some other mechanism.
> +HTTP/3 relies on QUIC version 1 as the underlying transport.  The use of other
> +QUIC transport versions with HTTP/3 MAY be defined by future specifications.
> +
> +QUIC version 1 uses TLS version 1.3 or greater as its handshake protocol.
> +HTTP/3 clients MUST support a mechanism to indicate the target host to the
> +server during the TLS handshake.  Unless an alternative mechanism for indicating
> +the target host is used, clients MUST use the Server Name Indication (SNI)
> +{{!RFC6066}} extension to TLS if the target host is a DNS name.
>
> @ekr <https://github.com/ekr> Do you think WebRTC would use HTTP/3? I was
> somewhat expecting WebRTC to build something directly over QUICv1, not over
> HTTP/3?
>
Oh, yes. I missed which document this was in.

> —
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3326?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAIPLINHXJVVGSN4A4G5ZJ3Q4YKX7A5CNFSM4KEDE2WKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFWFIHK3DMKJSXC5LFON2FEZLWNFSXPKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOCRCNCNQ#discussion_r364375027>,
> or unsubscribe
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAIPLIK34YQZLQWRQR7M5TDQ4YKX7ANCNFSM4KEDE2WA>
> .
>


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3326#issuecomment-572298035