Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Confusing SNI recommendation in the HTTP/3 spec (#3324)

Ryan Hamilton <notifications@github.com> Wed, 08 January 2020 03:10 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BE29120041 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 19:10:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.382
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HJCIBwOAUQYa for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 19:10:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-24.smtp.github.com (out-24.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.207]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9DF212002E for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 19:10:27 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2020 19:10:26 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1578453026; bh=wmwqQvjZuN46iUvvGtQFseh2H7MHATQYIvIyIpU+UVo=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=Q3RG6A38Jax35oJM600Lpduemu+lI1mAARQxmoe8g6FsYyqUM8oZtniA9ivD9Ju6W 8YShpPYpkCUq9carHXFkgK6Wpbzq3IWWmXKG2pcTVZ2FyilaXFX5Ga5yVIsultjZdT vATUogABIFSwqziilt3TJ2PP+w4vfEW7obJuJYrk=
From: Ryan Hamilton <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK3U75TM7MSIFPEMN5F4EJ5KFEVBNHHCBE4OS4@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3324/571871861@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3324@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3324@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Confusing SNI recommendation in the HTTP/3 spec (#3324)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e154822dc00a_67e53feb190cd96c16989"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: RyanAtGoogle
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/OFIklIB-RgJ1OB5FZUOLgxSC6sw>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2020 03:10:29 -0000

That sounds reasonable. How about some text like:

HTTP/3 clients MUST support a mechanism to indicate the target host to the server during the TLS handshake. This may be done using the Server Name Indication (SNI) {{!RFC6066}} extension to TLS or using some other mechanism. If the target host is valid for this mechanism (in the case of SNI this means the host is a domain name) the client MUST indicate the host using this mechanism.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3324#issuecomment-571871861