IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] HTTP SETTINGS: why reuse codepoint 0x3? (#1847)

Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com> Tue, 09 October 2018 18:57 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4774C129619 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 11:57:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.455
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.455 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.456, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qkCyzyQQ1mOj for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 11:57:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o10.sgmail.github.com (o10.sgmail.github.com [167.89.101.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95DA7128D68 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 11:57:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=DKiKoQJvgFdFAZ91wigenf+ZaIo=; b=t9aQ3dXDiJdsSEK8 E12UFp0nOcvZpIE3V1y3VOshDqPhyp+23s5P26+9E7IxAe90SrdLXbdhKYdVrxDI PzX3+ABsqDjXKToWhDQlqg/23vUbd4k8HASz9d9Pgz6RdXD59WwT9c/a6wA+O8GJ lXCbZ7KOU+m8unjF9dIN3ASrrjg=
Received: by filter1509p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter1509p1mdw1-19223-5BBCFA27-1B 2018-10-09 18:57:43.572089772 +0000 UTC m=+1140096.467122770
Received: from github-lowworker-f6df7df.cp1-iad.github.net (unknown [192.30.252.41]) by ismtpd0017p1iad2.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id Qz95yHxISPmh-uKYQA1xHA for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 09 Oct 2018 18:57:43.481 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from github.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by github-lowworker-f6df7df.cp1-iad.github.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E6F63E17C6 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 11:57:43 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2018 18:57:43 +0000
From: Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abba2e46f525ef77c79256e0488a9649b87fda436392cf0000000117d4bc2792a169ce15f37541@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1847/428309951@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1847@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1847@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] HTTP SETTINGS: why reuse codepoint 0x3? (#1847)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5bbcfa2771e9a_d3a3fe5960d45c4606cd"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: MikeBishop
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak1oZiLlgmkC6ZiYJENUZ+/8ylDHR6EHjt3heL QvZyYQEb8MJmyBdPHIJ3NkNmZv11Hl1nAo5d41ypkQ3HvjuEoooMPjym8zyWCcgjKU+T/uP+xMFOzS XHxanb6Avb8UOZnTN6vIw/a9pj0OzBQfrulnv4fHJOekjCuMPH7PgaRv0zaliXxWh3Hxymyj8NKD9e 4=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/OTAMvJv8rro0mEQzvjnilA1XV_Y>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2018 18:57:46 -0000

Hand-wavy similarity.  It's a limit on the number of a given resource the peer is allowed to consume.  I frankly don't care one way or the other -- if having the reuse causes more issues for anyone's implementation than changing the codepoint does, I'm happy to move it.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1847#issuecomment-428309951

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email