Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are transport parameters mandatory? (#2528)

Martin Thomson <> Wed, 20 March 2019 04:19 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADC421279A4 for <>; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 21:19:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.384
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.384 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gj5XqOxwBtHB for <>; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 21:19:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10AE71277D8 for <>; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 21:19:40 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 21:19:39 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1553055579; bh=YaUMqFoxrHVy1+/Sc1T1x16tn7KdAcEyk9KGOHMfe+k=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=DMOFM/HnKiQp8pOnc+Sv8nHtNJyTXIny2odhzuBT2Hoydc4Hudl0yjY6qcRwbYz4U usgkMmOH7AIn+jak/4+TL2x7AHNorDyrvyiYy78Sht8cd0A5vwkc4Z7dM4DENoDbKS Ob0ZBUYRb1/I9STYVhMvAnkTHKE2MvvNE1Ep1LKQ=
From: Martin Thomson <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2528/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Are transport parameters mandatory? (#2528)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c91bf5b2f64b_55873fcc77cd45b4151913"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 04:19:42 -0000

The question arose when we realized that you can have a perfectly functional stack with the defaults. And it was non- trivial sending any. 

However, if the client doesn't send any, it prevents the server from sending any. That seems bad.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: