IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] What should the receiver do when the peer closes a unidirectional stream before providing the stream type? (#2331)

Lucas Pardue <notifications@github.com> Sat, 12 January 2019 22:27 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EF32131106 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Jan 2019 14:27:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.935
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.935 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-4.553, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CmHrrOf0c7rU for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Jan 2019 14:27:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-1.smtp.github.com (out-1.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.192]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE76E131105 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sat, 12 Jan 2019 14:27:24 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2019 14:27:23 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1547332043; bh=FnxD8fDxA2qmm6eQ/zjYXjLSj2bzAfASifzk5hT+6Hk=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=PypXdK4nV2lqr2JrdRsHpp7ekaZM6mROvr1ODN18GuHHvRmYBBorHmb9rG1Wafv8h WgkKmaDlgDX4UZf6NlIQF3lfsL4P5UwFM36liLuGxKZ1H0SlW88G6AFaUalbyJP4hD HTKVh/8KUl16hvyQiXAB5Wa203/O4CEBOWfOypdQ=
From: Lucas Pardue <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab814a6f0658b4464db9a0494e82762537ce5950bd92cf0000000118522bcb92a169ce17c1011d@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2331/453785642@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2331@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2331@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] What should the receiver do when the peer closes a unidirectional stream before providing the stream type? (#2331)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c3a69cb9ce40_27723f8759cd45b8381058"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: LPardue
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/PQIVl8mLu_Os8dKlZ-zufSSeYLc>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2019 22:27:26 -0000

Given that resetting a control stream is going to cause a connection error, I don't know why an implementation would ever try to do that. The risk is high, what is the benefit?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2331#issuecomment-453785642

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email