IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Reference 3168 for ECN (#3241)

Jana Iyengar <notifications@github.com> Sun, 17 November 2019 03:37 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 118ED120835 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 19:37:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.596
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.596 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jgRQfJXxW5cK for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 19:37:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-22.smtp.github.com (out-22.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.205]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4576C120837 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 19:37:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from github-lowworker-edec459.ac4-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-edec459.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.18.32]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A24CCA0C33 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 19:37:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1573961821; bh=C0cJh0J/Rprtt9xQs8FatviTrr2YmcrZGNzLjUd7Fqw=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=N7pzXP2xNEkjP6At5ub4oS+IQPhydbP1hTm1HkMjX3EbLGARfyd4yr031Uj0rogc1 iTRk9pQvp4hL9Tw8pttoSbSs+sC7j7DxZ6ulK5aiYHAe8WnYJ17X4xEaD/1xQ4hQj9 6GBs/jTq/X0Udp0FbGelH/L4NjDLt21dI1Srjnd8=
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2019 19:37:01 -0800
From: Jana Iyengar <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK3CPMDB27KC6LU6RYF33XZN3EVBNHHB6OUG3M@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3241/review/317999220@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3241@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3241@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Reference 3168 for ECN (#3241)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5dd0c05d930ef_349f3f8a258cd964834064"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: janaiyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/Q4kqAEpwtMXk7sahGiefTpXH19U>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2019 03:37:04 -0000

janaiyengar commented on this pull request.



> @@ -655,11 +655,11 @@ to support different algorithms.
 
 ## Explicit Congestion Notification {#congestion-ecn}
 
-If a path has been verified to support ECN, QUIC treats a Congestion Experienced
-codepoint in the IP header as a signal of congestion. This document specifies an
-endpoint's response when its peer receives packets with the Congestion
-Experienced codepoint.  As discussed in {{!RFC8311}}, endpoints are permitted to
-experiment with other response functions.
+If a path has been verified to support ECN as specified in {{?RFC3168}} and
+updated in {{?RFC8311}}, QUIC treats a Congestion Experienced(CE) codepoint in

Suggestion: "If a path has been verified to support ECN {{?RFC3168}} {{?RFC8311}}"

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3241#pullrequestreview-317999220

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email