Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] RTT measurement using PATH_* frames (#2644)

Jana Iyengar <notifications@github.com> Thu, 09 May 2019 02:43 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD1A612006F for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 May 2019 19:43:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.606
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.606 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nUH_IXSsWtYu for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 May 2019 19:43:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-17.smtp.github.com (out-17.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4687612004D for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 May 2019 19:43:10 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 08 May 2019 19:43:09 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1557369789; bh=YZHTbcgmtKzYtkynzelQFMLYSLOjBKuNnuQt99TsYsU=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=U2XuPuOo9piZ4/4fc5vPvIZaWnQD3U5uSWrF6K0jStx8TDKc3IHH5xHLSc20acJlO sRsJCt5UnREqEnPYam4GV8BDPCqnYJ+1M1LimGoNtgr16pBoNP8F+ZCU3LzXTpDVwq xcVI9Nx/n0JHVwwH59L0F89p7O2c6yjc2eGuymUg=
From: Jana Iyengar <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK62SFWYPPREG6FMYLF24DDD3EVBNHHBUAKJI4@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2644/490721850@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2644@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2644@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] RTT measurement using PATH_* frames (#2644)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5cd393bd5763d_47c03faf486cd96413672c"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: janaiyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/QK_LtEeI59irVMGwgufwOvEEN7M>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 May 2019 02:43:12 -0000

@rpaulo, #2637 removes that text. @ianswett is right, we'll need to caveat this at a minimum. I think it gets a bit tricky to use the PATH_CHALLENGE/RESPONSE for RTT if the RESPONSE can arrive on any path. The endpoint does not know what path will be used for data/acks, and it would have to assume that the path for CHALLENGE/RESPONSE will be the one used for data/acks, if it is to set its RTT estimate.

Perhaps we could say that an endpoint can use the CHALLENGE/RESPONSE RTT as a hint.

This will need some more thought.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2644#issuecomment-490721850