IETF Logo Mail Archive

[quicwg/base-drafts] Handling failed migration (#2131)

ekr <notifications@github.com> Wed, 12 December 2018 17:01 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 607A5130E55 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 09:01:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.842
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.842 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.46, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r2Pac0dinKLb for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 09:01:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-1.smtp.github.com (out-1.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.192]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C25CF126DBF for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 09:01:47 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 09:01:46 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1544634106; bh=ULY4CMLToKzQA0iqm7DDl+LHdIRo7DeLxE5dZLdd1f4=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:Subject:List-ID:List-Archive:List-Post: List-Unsubscribe:From; b=bbPYAV7TUk+K6MCxZNsU1zZh6k5ve+3S3/Nzh1xBa/M5ilkOheGd25w633AwCBo7h I53ZO411A9I6rhh9vMFu4oluhTGQ7kAuPudIifrrERMAvYPHpofsTfWxXxym5jsR3K 0lJBwhEMYWHJIlH/nQetcHFHe09BdtXmbbg3QWgk=
From: ekr <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abc065b2cb84c16ab0f3bf5ba5fa98125462f1fb1a92cf00000001182900fa92a169ce1743d058@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2131@github.com>
Subject: [quicwg/base-drafts] Handling failed migration (#2131)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c113efab5ea1_49863f96f44d45c086545"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ekr
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/QOMUlsBsPu50IzaxJ4Y__PiBk_U>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 17:01:49 -0000

S 9.3. says:

```
After changing the address to which it sends non-probing packets, an endpoint
could abandon any path validation for other addresses.
```

And 9.3.2. says:
```
Note that receipt of packets with higher packet numbers from the legitimate peer
address will trigger another connection migration.  This will cause the
validation of the address of the spurious migration to be abandoned.
```

Which one of these is right?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2131

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email